2015
DOI: 10.1242/dev.114629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavefish eye loss in response to an early block in retinal differentiation progression

Abstract: The troglomorphic phenotype shared by diverse cave-dwelling animals is regarded as a classical example of convergent evolution. One unresolved question is whether the characteristic eye loss in diverse cave species is based on interference with the same genetic program. Phreatichthys andruzzii, a Somalian cavefish, has evolved under constant conditions in complete darkness and shows severe troglomorphic characteristics, such as complete loss of eyes, pigments and scales. During early embryonic development, a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there were fewer signs of apoptosis in the lens tissues. Both findings were in contrast to the known mechanisms underlying eye degeneration in Astyanax cavefish [70]. On the other hand, they found late retinal differentiation events affected and retinal apoptosis to be the driving force of eye degeneration in these fish.…”
Section: Work On Other Cavefish Speciescontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…In addition, there were fewer signs of apoptosis in the lens tissues. Both findings were in contrast to the known mechanisms underlying eye degeneration in Astyanax cavefish [70]. On the other hand, they found late retinal differentiation events affected and retinal apoptosis to be the driving force of eye degeneration in these fish.…”
Section: Work On Other Cavefish Speciescontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…However, the peak marker for the PAXB QTL is not included in the CERC QTL interval, suggesting the two chromosome 21 QTL might have distinct genetic bases as well. Thus, it appears that similar changes in morphology (more teeth) have evolved via largely distinct developmental genetic mechanisms, as has been found in sex comb patterning (Tanaka et al, 2009) and wing size (Zwaan et al, 2000) in Drosophila, trunk elongation in salamanders (Parra-Olea and Wake, 2001) and eye loss in different cavefish species (Stemmer et al, 2015).…”
Section: Distinct Genetic Bases Underlie Convergently Evolved Tooth Gainmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The adult fishes completely lack eyes, pigments and scales and their metabolic rate is extremely reduced. In particular, the eye is totally regressed 36 h post fertilization and 1 month later there remains only a rudimentary cyst, with loss of the optic nerves and strongly reduced optic lobes (Berti et al, 2001;Stemmer et al, 2015). This degeneration is rather premature compared, for example, with what is known for the blind Mexican cavefish Astyanax mexicanus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%