51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-3768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavitating Venturi Model Using Standard Element and Options in Commercially Available Lumped-Parameter Software

Abstract: Numerous liquid propulsion applications utilize cavitating venturis to provide a passive liquid flow control to the propellants within the system. Selecting the appropriate venturi configuration for the vehicle propellant system often requires multiple experimental iterations which could be decreased if an appropriate dynamic fluid model were developed. As a first step toward the creation of such a model, a cavitating venturi element was developed using a commercially available lumped-parameter software. The t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using Fluent 15.0 to conduct steady-state computation for the triple eccentric butterfly valve, Sun et al [18] discovered that the surface roughness may result in a big difference between the flow coefficient obtained by simulation without friction and the actual flow coefficient. The second type of research [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] focuses on the whole system rather than the valve, and thus generally uses the traditional 0D throttling flow-rate equation instead of the momentum equation to describe the dynamic throttling effect of the valve spool. In order to accurately describe the throttling effect, this simplified modeling method must take flow-rate equation, flow coefficient calculation, and valve-spool opening and closing rule into full consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By using Fluent 15.0 to conduct steady-state computation for the triple eccentric butterfly valve, Sun et al [18] discovered that the surface roughness may result in a big difference between the flow coefficient obtained by simulation without friction and the actual flow coefficient. The second type of research [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] focuses on the whole system rather than the valve, and thus generally uses the traditional 0D throttling flow-rate equation instead of the momentum equation to describe the dynamic throttling effect of the valve spool. In order to accurately describe the throttling effect, this simplified modeling method must take flow-rate equation, flow coefficient calculation, and valve-spool opening and closing rule into full consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, as the core of the throttling model, the valve-spool or orifice throttling flow-rate equation is a semi-theoretical and semi-empirical formula. By the form of relationship between the flow rate and the upstream and downstream pressures, it can be roughly divided into the pressure ratio-based form [15,24,25] and the pressure difference-based form [15,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][40][41][42]. The former generally applies to the condition of gas flow medium while the latter usually applies to the condition of liquid flow medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation