2000
DOI: 10.1007/s003400050022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavitation bubble behavior and bubble-shock wave interaction near a gelatin surface as a study of in vivo bubble dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
102
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
102
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 (top)] which holds down to the smallest bubbles detectable. A similar scaling for bubbles between 0.1 and 1 mm has been found by Kodama and Tomita [18]. Direct optical measurements of the diameter of the jet are difficult because of the strongly curved gaseous layer covering the jet.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…6 (top)] which holds down to the smallest bubbles detectable. A similar scaling for bubbles between 0.1 and 1 mm has been found by Kodama and Tomita [18]. Direct optical measurements of the diameter of the jet are difficult because of the strongly curved gaseous layer covering the jet.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Strikingly, these mists exactly coincide with the instants of predicted shockwave radiation. Namely, the spark (or primary) shockwave is emitted at the spark generation initiating the bubble growth, and collapse (or secondary) shockwaves are radiated at the bubble collapse and subsequent col- lapses of rebound bubbles [14]. Although these shockwaves were not directly observable with the present setup, their exact synchronization with microbubbles clearly discloses a causal relation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Lord Rayleigh [87] derived this equation based on energy considerations. An alternative approach based on the Bernoulli equation is followed here (figure 22).…”
Section: Appendix a Basic Bubble Dynamics Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%