1999
DOI: 10.1299/kikaib.65.3993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavitation Performance of Cylindrical Choke for Unsteady Flow. 2nd Report. Comparison of Difference in Inlet Shape of Choke.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Japanese researchers Aoyama Yuri etc. [8][9][10][11] adopting flow visualization technique have experimental studied the cavitation performance of cylindrical choke pipe with a sharp edged-corner under steady and unsteady flows. The choke pipe engenders cavitation phenomenon under steady and unsteady flows by remaining the downstream pressure and changing the upstream pressure or by remaining the upstream pressure and changing the downstream pressure.…”
Section: Fig 3 Cavitation Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Japanese researchers Aoyama Yuri etc. [8][9][10][11] adopting flow visualization technique have experimental studied the cavitation performance of cylindrical choke pipe with a sharp edged-corner under steady and unsteady flows. The choke pipe engenders cavitation phenomenon under steady and unsteady flows by remaining the downstream pressure and changing the upstream pressure or by remaining the upstream pressure and changing the downstream pressure.…”
Section: Fig 3 Cavitation Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%