Cavity Adaptation of Water-Based Restoratives Placed as Liners under a Resin Composite

Abraham, Sheela; Gaintantzopoulou, Marianna; Εliades, George

doi:10.1155/2017/5957107

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Marginal sealing (studied with microleakage studies) and shear-bond strength (SBS) are 2 properties that have to be evaluated to indicate the use of a dentin substitute [ 12 13 ]. Although the use of Biodentine has been validated following several studies evaluating the interfaces, SBS and marginal adaptation in an “open sandwich” technique, there is still limited information on leakage [ 9 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interface between calcium silicate cement and adhesive systems according to adhesive families and cement maturation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the interface between a calcium silicate cement (CSC), Biodentine and dental adhesives in terms of sealing ability. Materials and Methods Microleakage test: 160 standardized class II cavities were prepared on 80 extracted human molars. The cavities were filled with Biodentine and then divided into 2 experimental groups according to the time of restoration: composite resin obturation 15 minutes after Biodentine handling (D0); restoration after 7 days (D7). Each group was then divided into 8 subgroups ( n = 5) according to the adhesive system used: etch-and-rinse adhesive (Prime & Bond); self-etch adhesive 2 steps (Optibond XTR and Clearfil SE Bond); self-etch adhesive 1 step (Xeno III, G-aenial Bond, and Clearfil Tri-S Bond); and universal used as etch-and-rinse or self-etch (ScotchBond Universal ER or SE). After thermocycling, the teeth were immersed in a silver nitrate solution, stained, longitudinally sectioned, and the Biodentine/adhesive percolation was quantified. Scanning electron microscopic observations: Biodentine/adhesive interfaces were observed. Results A tendency towards less microleakage was observed when Biodentine was etched (2.47%) and when restorations were done without delay (D0: 4.31%, D7: 6.78%), but this was not significant. The adhesives containing 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate monomer showed the most stable results at both times studied. All Biodentine/adhesive interfaces were homogeneous and regular. Conclusions The good sealing of the CSC/adhesive interface is not a function of the system adhesive family used or the cement maturation before restoration. Biodentine can be used as a dentine substitute.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interface between calcium silicate cement and adhesive systems according to adhesive families and cement maturation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to cracks, the bulk of GIC contains pores. Porosity, defined as the presence of empty spaces inside [48] μCT Wet (100% RH), 37°C, 48 h.…”

Section: Structural Integrity Of the Bulkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Yes (1) C, A (2) No the bulk of GIC, was reported in 11 studies [48,51,53,59,62,64,66,71,74,76,78], but it was sometimes identified as "voids," "air bubbles," or "air inclusions." Three out of the 11 studies measured the porosity in the bulk of the restorations in either 3D [48] or 2D [59,62]. A μCT-based study by Abraham et al [48] used silver nitrate infiltration to quantify the 3D percentage of porosity in entire fillings reporting a 0.88% prevalence.…”

Section: Nomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The forgotten merits of GIC restorations: a systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To reevaluate proven strengths and weakness of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and to identify agreement versus conflicting evidence in previous reports regarding the transition between GIC and the tooth, and the existence of an "interphase". Materials and methods Relevant electronic databases (PubMed, Embase via Ovid and Medline via Web of science) were searched for publications of evidence relating to the transition zone at the GIC-tooth interphase. Studies were examined and grouped according to characteristics of GIC-tooth attachment area quantified by X-ray and optical microscopy techniques in 2D and 3D. Results Inclusion criteria comprised of in vitro studies that showed images of the conventional GIC-tooth substrate attachments using at least one of the following techniques: SEM, CLSM, or μCT. The search identified 419 studies, from which 33 were included. Ten studies demonstrated the existence of an interphase layer and five studies quantified the layer thickness (1-15 μ). Twenty-nine publications studied different failure modes of the GIC-tooth interphase. Eleven studies described discontinuities inside the GIC bulk. Conclusion The GIC-tooth interphase attributes evolve with time. Good attachment is evident even under compromised surface preparation. The GIC-tooth attachment area is resistant to acidic dissolution as compared to both tooth and GIC bulk. In general, studies revealed mostly intact GIC-tooth interphases with only some cracked interphases. Clinical significance GIC bonds to the tooth structure and forms an acid resistant attachment zone that might enhance caries inhibition. Due to fluoride release and ease of use, GIC provides a cost effective treatment, ideal for low income or high caries populations.

show abstract

“…The manufacturer claims that the products iRoot-BP and iRoot-BP Plus are insoluble, radiopaque, need moisture to set and do not shrink during setting. However, recent results showed iRoot-SP as very soluble that does not fulfill the ANSI/ADA Specification 57/2000 [54].…”

Section: Physico-chemical Properties Of Cs Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physico-chemical and biological properties of dental calcium silicate cements - literature review

Ilic

Antonijević

Biočanin

et al. 2019

Hem Ind

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental cement materials have been developed with the aim to replace hard dental tissues. The first material used for pulp capping, root canal obturation, bifurcation perforation and apexification is calcium hydroxide (in 1920). A half century later, glass-ionomer cements began to suppress it as dentine substitutes. Finally, in the 1990s, calcium silicate (CS) material appeared in the dental research community as the most promising dentine substitute capable to adequately meet all clinical requirements. The aim of this paper is to present an overview of literature related to studies about CS materials taking into account their physical, chemical and biological properties and clinical applications. This review aims to discuss beneficial and adverse characteristics of CSs concerning interactions to the hard dentine and soft pulp/periodontal tissues. This review article deals with the literature data about currently commercially available CS concerning laboratory and clinical findings. 109 scientific articles were analyzed of which 62 references reported in vitro and 26 in vivo investigations while 21 references comprised reports, reviews and books dealing with both, in vitro and in vivo investigations. Although further data collection is necessary, CSs are promising materials that represent a gold standard for numerous dental clinical procedures.

show abstract

Cavity Adaptation of Water-Based Restoratives Placed as Liners under a Resin Composite

Cited by 9 publications

References 41 publications

Interface between calcium silicate cement and adhesive systems according to adhesive families and cement maturation

Interface between calcium silicate cement and adhesive systems according to adhesive families and cement maturation

The forgotten merits of GIC restorations: a systematic review

Physico-chemical and biological properties of dental calcium silicate cements - literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About