1993
DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90189-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavity formation during tensile straining of particulate and short fibre metal matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies of particulate metal matrix composites in tension have shown that the accumulation of damage can be characterized by the change in density of the material with strain [46,62,63] and that this change can be related to other damage measures such as change in stiffness [46,64,65]. In compression, since particle fracture is predominately perpendicular to the principal tensile axes, the segments of the broken particle can move apart following the deformation of the material around them, as shown schematically in Fig.…”
Section: Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of particulate metal matrix composites in tension have shown that the accumulation of damage can be characterized by the change in density of the material with strain [46,62,63] and that this change can be related to other damage measures such as change in stiffness [46,64,65]. In compression, since particle fracture is predominately perpendicular to the principal tensile axes, the segments of the broken particle can move apart following the deformation of the material around them, as shown schematically in Fig.…”
Section: Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies have determined that the predominant damage micromechanisms leading to this degradation are: (i) reinforcement fracture, (ii) void nucleation and growth in the matrix and (iii) debonding along the matrix/reinforcement interface [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. With respect to the influence of basic microstructural parameters on the rate of damage accumulation, it has been shown that increasing reinforcement size, angularity, aspect ratio, volume fraction, inhomogeneity in spatial distribution, interface degradation and matrix strength increases the level of damage in particle reinforced MMCs [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mismatches can induce large stresses within the inclusions or at the matrix-inclusion interfaces [10,11]. A number of failure modes in MMCs have been reported in the past, including matrix/particle debonding [12][13][14][15][16], particle cracking [11,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and ductile failure in the matrix [25,26]. The elastic modulus, flow stress and ductility of MMCs are found to drop significantly as soon as such failures occur [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%