1989
DOI: 10.1115/1.3250661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavity Heat Transfer on a Transverse Grooved Wall in a Narrow Flow Channel

Abstract: Measurements are presented of local convection heat transfer for the case of flow through a narrow slot-type channel where one of the bounding walls contains a transverse rectangular cavity. The experimental situation is a stationary modeling of some salient features of flow through the clearance gap at the grooved tips of axial turbine blades. Cavity depth-to-width ratios of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 are included for each of clearance-to-width ratios of 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15. Overall heat transfer on the cavity floor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The k-epsilon model, however, uses wall functions to bridge the near wall laminar sublayer and fails to predict flow separation or reattachment at any point within the cavity with the result that it incorrectly predicts a single cavity vortex. For a more quantitative comparison, Metzger et al [9] performed heat transfer measurements along the bottom of a cavity where the aspect ratio was varied from 0.1 to 0.5. Since flow patterns were not available, the predicted variation of Nusselt number (non-dimensional HTC) along the bottom of the cavity was compared with experiment (in this case Nu = Ch/k, where C = channel depth above the cavity (5.08 mm), h = local heat transfer coefficient and k = thermal conductivity of the fluid).…”
Section: Best-practice Methods For a Rans Approach To Cavity Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The k-epsilon model, however, uses wall functions to bridge the near wall laminar sublayer and fails to predict flow separation or reattachment at any point within the cavity with the result that it incorrectly predicts a single cavity vortex. For a more quantitative comparison, Metzger et al [9] performed heat transfer measurements along the bottom of a cavity where the aspect ratio was varied from 0.1 to 0.5. Since flow patterns were not available, the predicted variation of Nusselt number (non-dimensional HTC) along the bottom of the cavity was compared with experiment (in this case Nu = Ch/k, where C = channel depth above the cavity (5.08 mm), h = local heat transfer coefficient and k = thermal conductivity of the fluid).…”
Section: Best-practice Methods For a Rans Approach To Cavity Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having established the required boundary layer resolution for predicting the vortex patterns within cavities such as these, various turbulence models were examined and compared to experiment [8,9] to check the accuracy of the solutions. Unfortunately, flow visualisation or heat transfer data for cavities with identical aspect ratios was not available.…”
Section: Best-practice Methods For a Rans Approach To Cavity Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of this validation exercise, experiments by Metzger et al [43] were examined, where heat transfer measurements were made along the bottom of a cavity with aspect ratio varying from 0.1 to 0.5. The results for the cavity with D/W = 0.2 are shown in Figs.…”
Section: Single Phase Flow Distribution In a Driven Cavitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metzger et al [2] studied the local convection heat transfer in a narrow slot-type channel with a rectangular groove. The flow was reduced by increasing the groove depth up to an aspect ratio of 0.2 in their experimental measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%