2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4sm00667d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavity method for force transmission in jammed disordered packings of hard particles

Abstract: The force distribution of jammed disordered packings has always been considered a central object in the physics of granular materials. However, many of its features are poorly understood. In particular, analytic relations to other key macroscopic properties of jammed matter, such as the contact network and its coordination number, are still lacking. Here we develop a mean-field theory for this problem, based on the consideration of the contact network as a random graph where the force transmission becomes a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For an isostatic system at jamming the force network ensemble is not needed, since the contact geometry uniquely defines the contact forces (Charbonneau et al, 2015b;Gendelman et al, 2016;Lerner et al, 2013). In this case, an approximation of P (f ) can be calculated with the cavity method assuming a locally tree-like contact geometry corresponding to an assumption of replica symmetry (RS) (Bo et al, 2014). We note that a correct determination of P (f ) requires one to take into account subtle correlations between particle positions that exist at jamming beyond RS, and that are neglected in (Bo et al, 2014), which in the end fails to account for the non-trivial power-laws of P (f ) at jamming.…”
Section: Force Network Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For an isostatic system at jamming the force network ensemble is not needed, since the contact geometry uniquely defines the contact forces (Charbonneau et al, 2015b;Gendelman et al, 2016;Lerner et al, 2013). In this case, an approximation of P (f ) can be calculated with the cavity method assuming a locally tree-like contact geometry corresponding to an assumption of replica symmetry (RS) (Bo et al, 2014). We note that a correct determination of P (f ) requires one to take into account subtle correlations between particle positions that exist at jamming beyond RS, and that are neglected in (Bo et al, 2014), which in the end fails to account for the non-trivial power-laws of P (f ) at jamming.…”
Section: Force Network Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(47), the inequality γ ≥ 1/(2 + θ) is still observed, except for one packing A which is presumably hyperstatic. On the other limit of sparse graphs, replica symmetry calculations gives θ = 0 in the thermodynamic limit using population dynamics implying that RS calculations do not capture the full physics of the jamming point (Bo et al, 2014) Assuming ergodicity for a jammed system of grains as proposed by Edwards (see Sec. II.C) seems contradictory at first, but has become meaningful in the first place in light of certain seminal compaction experiments developed over the years starting from the work of Nowak et at.…”
Section: Force Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the low-force end of the force distribution has a power law, like in the CLM simulations, but the exponent is much larger in the bi-q-model, we observe θ ≈ 4. The underestimation of the number of low forces is a known deficiency of the q-model [50]. At q 1 = 0.92, that is, when the contrast between force transmission in the unthickened and thickened states is large, the large-force tail in the thickened state is signif- icantly altered and decays much slower than at lower q 1 .…”
Section: < L a T E X I T S H A 1 _ B A S E 6 4 = " V / H / H Z 4 8 + mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although missing from many theoretical approaches (5,34), the distribution of contact forces at ϕ c is known empirically to follow Pðf Þ ∼ f θ f at small f, with θ f ≈ 0:2 (20,35). This directly yields a diverging distribution of stiffnesses: PðkÞ = Pðf Þdf =dk ∼ k α , with α = −ð1 − θ f Þ=2 < 0.…”
Section: Hard Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%