2016
DOI: 10.3390/s16101734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCD-Based Skinning Injury Recognition on Potato Tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.): A Comparison between Visible and Biospeckle Imaging

Abstract: Skinning injury on potato tubers is a kind of superficial wound that is generally inflicted by mechanical forces during harvest and postharvest handling operations. Though skinning injury is pervasive and obstructive, its detection is very limited. This study attempted to identify injured skin using two CCD (Charge Coupled Device) sensor-based machine vision technologies, i.e., visible imaging and biospeckle imaging. The identification of skinning injury was realized via exploiting features extracted from vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical damage is a major cause of reduced durability and quality of products (Gao et al, 2016) although inevitable in the harvest and post-harvest stages of potato tubers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical damage is a major cause of reduced durability and quality of products (Gao et al, 2016) although inevitable in the harvest and post-harvest stages of potato tubers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated impact of root and tuber disease-related losses on Brazilian imports is 25% of the production, with the largest losses occurring due to postharvest handling and storage (Costa, Guilhoto, & Burnquist, 2015). Excoriation is the major cause of postharvest losses (Gao, Geng, Rao, & Ying, 2016); however, the effect of damage in potato tubers can be reduced through postharvest curing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is to measure the torque at which the periderm excoriates using a torquemeter (Lulai & Orr, 1993). A more direct approach, which is amenable to image-based phenotyping and more closely aligned with human perception, is to record the percentage of missing skin on an area basis (Gao, Geng, Rao, & Ying, 2016). Varietal differences in skin set are widely recognized, but very little is known about the genetic basis of this critical trait (Halderson & Henning, 1993;Lulai, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%