2009
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-250605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCL2/CCR2: push/pull for migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CXCR4 antagonists are in clinical development for mobilization of stem cells in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients (phase I and phase II clinical trials). A drawback of disruption of the CXCL12/CXCR4 interaction may be the release of leukaemic cells from the bone marrow into the blood, which may not be desirable in DS (Avvisati, 2009; Burger & Peled, 2009; Horuk, 2009; Xia & Sui, 2009). As multiple chemokine receptors may be involved in the pathogenesis of DS, the use of dual‐chemokine receptor antagonists, such as a CXCR1/CXCR2 antagonists or CCR2/CXCR2 antagonists, may be beneficial therapeutically (Bertini et al , 2004; Walters et al , 2008; Horuk, 2009).…”
Section: Two‐step Model For Pulmonary Infiltration Of Apl Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CXCR4 antagonists are in clinical development for mobilization of stem cells in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients (phase I and phase II clinical trials). A drawback of disruption of the CXCL12/CXCR4 interaction may be the release of leukaemic cells from the bone marrow into the blood, which may not be desirable in DS (Avvisati, 2009; Burger & Peled, 2009; Horuk, 2009; Xia & Sui, 2009). As multiple chemokine receptors may be involved in the pathogenesis of DS, the use of dual‐chemokine receptor antagonists, such as a CXCR1/CXCR2 antagonists or CCR2/CXCR2 antagonists, may be beneficial therapeutically (Bertini et al , 2004; Walters et al , 2008; Horuk, 2009).…”
Section: Two‐step Model For Pulmonary Infiltration Of Apl Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noticeably, the enhanced migration of phagocytes was not caused by nucleotides such as ATP released from apoptotic cells that function as chemoattractants because apyrase, a ATP-diphosphatase, had no effect on cell migration induced by conditioned medium, and the level of ATP was much lower in conditioned medium than in apoptotic supernatants, which is likely due to degradation of ATP by CD39, an ectonucleotidase that catalyzes hydrolysis of triphosphonucleosides to the monophosphonucleoside derivative, expressed in peritoneal macrophages (Figure 3c-e) [27,28]. Ccr2 is the receptor for Mcp-1 and is highly expressed in monocytes [29]. Thus, we next investigated whether the enhanced migration of THP-1 cells to conditioned medium is dependent on Ccr2.…”
Section: Mcp-1 Promotes Phagocyte Chemoattractionmentioning
confidence: 99%