2009
DOI: 10.1038/nm1009-1112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCL3L1 and HIV/AIDS susceptibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, attempts to 164 replicate the data have been inconsistent, with several large studies failing to replicate the data 165 (table 1) (Bhattacharya et al 2009;Lee et al 2010). A recent meta-analysis of nine studies supported 166 an association of lower CCL3L1 with susceptibility to HIV (Liu et al 2010), but this study did not 167…”
Section: Host Copy Number Variation and Hiv 151mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, attempts to 164 replicate the data have been inconsistent, with several large studies failing to replicate the data 165 (table 1) (Bhattacharya et al 2009;Lee et al 2010). A recent meta-analysis of nine studies supported 166 an association of lower CCL3L1 with susceptibility to HIV (Liu et al 2010), but this study did not 167…”
Section: Host Copy Number Variation and Hiv 151mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, some reports demonstrated an association between high CCL3L1 copy numbers and a reduced prevalence of HIV seropositivity, slower progression to AIDS, and improved recovery of CD4 ϩ T cells (45,(56)(57)(58), whereas other studies and follow-up correspondences failed to detect an association even within the same data set (59)(60)(61). Some researchers have suggested that the CCL3L1 copy number estimation method used in those association studies could be flawed, for example, due to DNA degradation, inconsistent quality among DNA samples, the use of inappropriate DNA amounts in the real-time PCR assay, inappropriate comparison of threshold cycle (C T ) values from samples run in different real-time PCR experimental repeats, or inappropriate rounding of copy numbers to the nearest integer value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations have intuitive appeal, as ligands of CCR5 have been shown experimentally to inhibit HIV-1 replication (Cocchi et al 1995;Menten et al 1999Menten et al , 2002Nibbs et al 1999;Xin et al 1999). However, the link between CCL3L1 copy number and HIV-1 infection has been called into question by subsequent, independent studies, which have failed to reproduce the correlation (Bhattacharya et al 2009;Urban et al 2009). Likewise, after correcting for known influence of the MHC class I and TRIM5 loci on SIV infection, Lim et al did not find a significant correlation between CCL3L1 copy number and replication of SIVmac in rhesus macaques (Lim et al 2010b).…”
Section: Chemokine Receptors and Chemokinesmentioning
confidence: 99%