Surveillance, Crime and Social Control 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315242002-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCTV and the Social Structuring of Surveillance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
20
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For one, despite the emphasis many operations place on the live monitoring of cameras, operator activity is often low. This finding is consistent across various operational definitions of activity, such as crimes reported to police by CCTV operators , arrests in response to CCTV detections (Ditton and Short, 1999;Norris and Armstrong, 1999b;, evidence or intelligence captured by CCTV (Sarno et al, 1999;Waples and Gill, 2006;King et al, 2008), and proactive 'targeted surveillances' conducted by CCTV operators (Norris and Armstrong, 1999a;Lomell, 2004;Norris and McCahill, 2006). Researchers have provided a variety of explanations for the consistently low-levels of activity, including the often high camera to operator ratio (Keval and Sasse, 2010;, the lack of formal training of operators (Bulos and Sarno, 1996;Loveday and Gill, 2004), lack of motivation on the part of operators (Norris and McCahill, 2006), and the fact that operators are often tasked with responsibilities unrelated to the proactive monitoring of cameras (Leman-Langlois, 2002;.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For one, despite the emphasis many operations place on the live monitoring of cameras, operator activity is often low. This finding is consistent across various operational definitions of activity, such as crimes reported to police by CCTV operators , arrests in response to CCTV detections (Ditton and Short, 1999;Norris and Armstrong, 1999b;, evidence or intelligence captured by CCTV (Sarno et al, 1999;Waples and Gill, 2006;King et al, 2008), and proactive 'targeted surveillances' conducted by CCTV operators (Norris and Armstrong, 1999a;Lomell, 2004;Norris and McCahill, 2006). Researchers have provided a variety of explanations for the consistently low-levels of activity, including the often high camera to operator ratio (Keval and Sasse, 2010;, the lack of formal training of operators (Bulos and Sarno, 1996;Loveday and Gill, 2004), lack of motivation on the part of operators (Norris and McCahill, 2006), and the fact that operators are often tasked with responsibilities unrelated to the proactive monitoring of cameras (Leman-Langlois, 2002;.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 53%
“…The tactic's rise can be traced to Great Britain, where the Home Office's 'CCTV Challenge' provided direct funding for CCTV projects between 1994and 1997(Painter and Tilley, 1999. Continued government support and public enthusiasm for the tactic led to continued expansion in the following years to the extent that CCTV is widely considered Britain's 'crime prevention initiative of the century' (Norris and Armstrong, 1999a). The use of CCTV as a crime prevention tool appears to be gaining similar stature in the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the concerns that we highlight in this paper, particularly to do with the wide array of applications of surveillance technology to policework, discriminatory outcomes, the question of effective legal regulation and detrimental privacy outcomes apply equally to CCTV surveillance cameras. See Taylor and Gill (2014); Edwards (2005); Goold (2002;2004); Stedmon (2011); Norris and Armstrong (1999). A sustained exploration of the similarities and differences between BWV and CCTV in policework is beyond the scope of this paper, but is a necessary area of further research and could inform an understanding of how diverse surveillance tools operate in tandem to produce criminal justice outcomes.…”
Section: Investigative Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, so entrenched is this Black/white oppositional binary that an online search for a synonym for ‘threatening’, undertaken while writing this article, provided ‘black’ as a result (Thesaurus, 2018). In empirical studies of CCTV control room operators, Norris and Armstrong (1997, 1999) found a disproportionately high surveillance targeting of Black individuals (Smith, 2004). Yet, in the context of methamphetamines, ‘white trash’ is a pejorative and ‘othering’ term founded upon middle-class privilege and even eugenics (Linnemann and Wall, 2013: 324).…”
Section: See Criminalsmentioning
confidence: 99%