2005
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azi047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCTV: Beyond Penal Modernism?

Abstract: (Feeley and Simon 1994;Smandych 1999;Garland 1996). This article draws upon research conducted for the European Union-funded URBANEYE project 1 to ask how the rapid growth in the use of CCTV in the UK fits in with contemporary debates on the emergence of a 'post modern' penality (Garland 1996(Garland 2001Hallsworth 2002; Lucken 1999;O'Malley, 1999;Simon 1994

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
60
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, CCTV literatures have also been attentive to operators and those they observe; works have focused on the 'cat and mouse' of operator and surveyed, as those watched avoid areas or deliberately act suspiciously (see Armstrong and Norris, 1999;Ball, 2002). Other works, notably Norris and McCahill (2006), have been attentive to the social interaction and microsociologies of the control room and how operators interact with security systems and colleagues. However, I am interested in collapsing and unsettling the relations between observer and those observed, especially when the operator is called upon to act in ways that upset or surprise the normative structures, responsibilities and accountabilities of their roles and especially when operators are legally obliged to perform these disruptive tasks.…”
Section: Urban Cctvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, CCTV literatures have also been attentive to operators and those they observe; works have focused on the 'cat and mouse' of operator and surveyed, as those watched avoid areas or deliberately act suspiciously (see Armstrong and Norris, 1999;Ball, 2002). Other works, notably Norris and McCahill (2006), have been attentive to the social interaction and microsociologies of the control room and how operators interact with security systems and colleagues. However, I am interested in collapsing and unsettling the relations between observer and those observed, especially when the operator is called upon to act in ways that upset or surprise the normative structures, responsibilities and accountabilities of their roles and especially when operators are legally obliged to perform these disruptive tasks.…”
Section: Urban Cctvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our updated systematic reviews of these two interventions, we obtained and analyzed a total of 57 evaluations of high methodological quality (that is, involving before-and-after measures of crime in experimental and mostly comparable control areas); another 66 less rigorous evaluations were also obtained and analyzed ( Farrington and Welsh, 2007 ;Welsh and Farrington, 2009 ) for our earlier reviews, see Farrington and Welsh, 2002 ;Welsh and Farrington, 2004 ). And in recent years, there has been a marked and sustained growth in the use of public area CCTV in many Western nations, especially in the United Kingdom and United States ( Norris and McCahill, 2006 ;Savage, 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, for example, cam-era surveillance has been located within broader postmodern forms of penality based on the management and redistribution of risks (Norris and McCahill, 2006), rather than aspiring to modernist forms of re-normalizing or rehabilitating transgressors. In such circumstances, social control is no longer 'social'.…”
Section: Security-driven Resilience Logic 2: Devolving Preparing Andmentioning
confidence: 99%