2012
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD-1 mice show individual differences in nicotine preference in a modified two-bottle oral self-administration model

Abstract: Although both animal and human studies reveal significant contributions of genetics to smoking addiction, many human studies were underpowered or biased by potential confounding variables, and animal genetic studies are challenged by limited genetic variations and lack of convincing phenotypes. To address these concerns, we used non-sibling outbred CD-1 mice to evaluate individual differences in nicotine preference with a modified two-bottle oral self-administration model. Animals were first given free access … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that behavioural effects of nicotine can vary markedly by genotype 74 . The concentrations selected for testing in this experiment are consistent with other published work on nicotine drinking in mice, 39–41 and voluntary intake levels of nicotine in the HDID‐2 mice are similar to those of C57BL/6 mice in limited‐access procedures 39 . Interestingly, genotype effects have emerged for nicotine‐induced conditioned taste aversion, with C57BL/6J mice showing a relative insensitivity to the aversive effects of nicotine relative to the DBA/2J, BALB/cJ and C3H/HeJ strains 75 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it should be noted that behavioural effects of nicotine can vary markedly by genotype 74 . The concentrations selected for testing in this experiment are consistent with other published work on nicotine drinking in mice, 39–41 and voluntary intake levels of nicotine in the HDID‐2 mice are similar to those of C57BL/6 mice in limited‐access procedures 39 . Interestingly, genotype effects have emerged for nicotine‐induced conditioned taste aversion, with C57BL/6J mice showing a relative insensitivity to the aversive effects of nicotine relative to the DBA/2J, BALB/cJ and C3H/HeJ strains 75 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…All solutions were prepared daily and transferred into 10‐ml tubes, each fitted with a metal sipper and a ball bearing for drinking procedures. Drug concentrations were determined from previous studies of drinking behaviour in mice, when available 25,26,39–43 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this maternal liver disease probably sensitized this animal to any hsFlt-1-e15a effect, and promoted the development of a more severe and fulminant preeclampsia phenotype with heightened and early blood pressure elevation, generalized endothelial dysfunction, and generalized thrombotic disease, which affected the liver and the placenta, and led to consequent fetal growth restriction. We could not investigate maternal coagulation status in this mouse because we did not obtain maternal plasma specimens; however, since CD-1 is an outbred mouse strain with individual animals having a different genetic background [ 273 275 ], we hypothesize that the “EM35” mouse might have had a thrombotic disorder. This finding is consistent with the observation that inherited and acquired thrombophilias predispose for the development of severe preeclampsia and early-onset preeclampsia in humans [ 276 279 ], and also that women developing early-onset preeclampsia may have a pre-existing metabolic disease [ 22 , 280 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study examining the interaction between pre-pulse inhibition and locomotor sensitization found that low inhibitory rats (i.e., rats that had lower pre-pulse inhibition scores) were more prone to developing nicotine sensitization (Kayir et al, 2011). Additionally, there are a number of reports using an individual rodent's nicotine consumption or self-administration behavior as a data analysis tool (Adriani et al, 2002; Cao et al, 2012; Dadmarz and Vogel, 2003; Harris et al, 2009; Harris et al, 2011; Maehler et al, 2000; Nesil et al, 2011). These techniques bear mentioning here as they may be used in conjunction with other models to give more information about the individual rodents which have a higher reactivity to nicotine.…”
Section: Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%