2011
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-325944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD19-independent instruction of murine marginal zone B-cell development by constitutive Notch2 signaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
75
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some reports demonstrating the interaction between Notch pathway and Akt pathway [29][30][31] . Hampel et al 32 showed the increased phosphorylation of Akt in B cells expressing Notch2 intracellular domain. Our results confirmed the relevance between Notch2 and Akt pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some reports demonstrating the interaction between Notch pathway and Akt pathway [29][30][31] . Hampel et al 32 showed the increased phosphorylation of Akt in B cells expressing Notch2 intracellular domain. Our results confirmed the relevance between Notch2 and Akt pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the quality and the strength of the BCR repertoire determine whether positive selection of immature B cells by self ligands or microbiome derived ligands leads to deletion, FoB cell or MZB development [14][15][16]35 . It has been unclear how these three pathways are related.Pillai et al proposed that strong BCR signals favour FoB, whereas weak BCR signals promote MZB cell development 17,18,36,37 , although other investigators refuted this idea 11,15 . It was proposed that strong BCR signals render transitional cells in the follicle impervious to the presence of Dll1 mediated triggering of Notch2, whereas weak BCR signaling may enhance the expression of one or more components of the Notch2 signaling Although it is likely therefore that lack of MAPK mediated ADAM10 surface expression is the explanation for the MZB phenotype of Taok3-deficient mice, we also need to consider additional effects of Taok3 on MAPK-driven activation of NF-B, as canonical NF-B1 collaborates with Notch 2 in driving MZB fate determination 8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B1 cells derive from fetal progenitors and react to a restricted set of microbial ligands in a T cell-independent (TI) manner in serosal cavities and spleen 1 NF-B signaling emanating from the BAFF receptor [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . The quality of B cell antigen receptor (BCR) signals during positive selection of B cell precursors in the spleen is equally important in B cell fate decisions [14][15][16] , and it was proposed that weak or strong BCR signals might render cells receptive or resistant to Notch instruction 17,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation of the NOTCH2 pathway has been linked to B cell retention in the MZ 33 and constitutive expression of active NOTCH2 gives rise to increased numbers of MZ versus follicular B cells. 38 ALCAM, which is downregulated in MZ versus follicular B cells, 33,39 was also downregulated on Cxcr5 ¡/¡ Em-Tcl1 compared with follicular-located Em-Tcl1 cells. In support of the gene expression data, differences in surface expression levels between leukemic cells derived from Cxcr5 ¡/¡ Em-Tcl1 or Em-Tcl1 mice were confirmed for CD49d, ALCAM, and NOTCH2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%