Large animal models have long served as the proving grounds for advances in transplantation, bridging the gap between inbred mouse experimentation and human clinical trials. Although a variety of species have been and continue to be used, the emergence of highly targeted biologic-and antibody-based therapies has required models to have a high degree of homology with humans. Thus, the nonhuman primate has become the model of choice in many settings. This article will provide an overview of nonhuman primate models of transplantation. Issues of primate genetics and care will be introduced, and a brief overview of technical aspects for various transplant models will be discussed. Finally, several prominent immunosuppressive and tolerance strategies used in primates will be reviewed.A nimal experimentation has long provided a rational basis for the translation of treatments and techniques from the bench to the bedside. In general, all first-in-human trials require preparative animal experimentation to allow patients to make truly informed decisions about their participation. Properly designed animal studies in relevant species provide the necessary background experience with a novel approach to reasonably anticipate the efficacy or, at the very least, safety of a planned intervention. As such, they serve as a foundation on which human trials can be ethically designed, particularly in fields such as immunology, in which the complexity of the interactions involved has prevented the development of any sufficiently predictive in vitro model. Although animal models are far superior to in vitro models in projecting the potential of an approach, it must be recognized that they do not mimic clinical transplantation precisely, and thus cannot be expected to forecast the ultimate experience in humans.The mouse model has formed the backbone of medical research and development for many years owing to the relative ease of breeding and genetic manipulation of the animals at a comparatively low cost. For immunology research, the mouse immune system offers sufficient homology for pathway determination and mechanistic studies, and indeed represents the ideal platform for this type of endeavor. In contrast, the large animal models (dog, pig, and primate) are significantly more expensive and, with the exception of inbred miniature swine (Sachs 1992;Mezrich et al. 2003), exhibit increased genetic diversity, making definitive mechanistic studies much more difficult, if not impossible. However, this complexity makes large animals suited to preclinical studies, in which the addition of often-unanticipated variables allows for the examination of practicality, safety, and generalized efficacy. In general, mice define pathways, and large animal models help establish whether a particular pathway's effect is suffi-