Sensitivity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells to anti-CD20 mAbs is low and, therefore, the efficacy of monotherapy with current anti-CD20 mAbs is limited. At present, it is not known whether sensitivity of CLL cells to CD20 mAbs is modulated by microenvironmental stimuli. We have shown previously that in vitro CD40 stimulation of peripheral bloodderived CLL cells results in resistance to cytotoxic drugs. In the present study, we show that, in contrast, CD40 stimulation sensitizes CLL cells to the recently described novel type II anti-CD20 mAb GA101. Cell death occurred without crosslinking of GA101 and involved a lysosomedependent mechanism. Combining GA101 with various cytotoxic drugs resulted in additive cell death, not only in CD40-stimulated CLL cells, but also in p53-dysfunctional CLL cells. Our findings indicate that GA101 has efficacy against chemoresistant CLL, and provide a rationale for combining cytotoxic drugs with anti-CD20 mAbs. (Blood. 2011;118(19): 5178-5188)
IntroductionAlthough treatment results for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have improved considerably over the last decade, a curative drug regimen is still lacking. Similar to other B-cell malignancies such as follicular lymphoma and multiple myeloma, in CLL, the interaction of the malignant cells with their microenvironment in the lymph nodes, spleen, and possibly BM has been shown to play an important role in the biology of the disease. 1 We and others have previously shown that in vitro CD40 stimulation of CLL cells can to a certain extent mimic the lymph node environment and results in the induction of resistance of the CLL cells to cytotoxic drugs such as fludarabine, chlorambucil, bortezomib, and roscovitine. [2][3][4][5][6] These microenvironmental niches might be an important localization of minimal residual disease and form the basis for the relapses characterizing this disease. 1,[3][4][5]7,8 Moreover, after sequential treatments, selection of p53 dysfunctional clones occurs in up to 50% of patients, 9,10 which also results in chemoresistance. Therefore, there is a need for new treatments that circumvent microenvironmental chemoresistance and act independently of p53, possibly including anti-CD20 mAb-containing regimens. 11,12 However, sensitivity of CLL cells to anti-CD20 mAbs in vitro is low and monotherapy with conventional doses of the type I anti-CD20 mAb rituximab has only limited efficacy in CLL. Because of rituximab resistance or unresponsiveness, more potent anti-CD20 mAbs are currently being sought. Two types of anti-CD20 mAbs have been described. A prime difference is that, in contrast to type I anti-CD20 mAbs, type II mAbs are unable to translocate CD20 into lipid rafts or to evoke Ca 2ϩ flux. [13][14][15][16] Ofatumumab, a second-generation type I anti-CD20 mAb seems promising for the treatment of CLL, 17 although large amounts seem to be required. GA101 is a novel glycoengineered type II anti-CD20 mAb. Compared with rituximab, GA101 has enhanced direct cell death-inducing capacity and improved Ab-depende...