1998
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD44v3 and v6 variant isoform expression correlates with poor prognosis in early-stage vulvar cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In three pilot studies involving 30, 25, and 35 cases of primary vulvar carcinoma of different stages, CD44v3 and CD44v6 were associated with poor prognosis 9, 10, 12. Another study examined the immunohistochemically detected expression of CD44 in vulvar carcinoma FIGO Stage I 11. A major shortcoming of these studies was the absence of the availability of a groin lymph node status11 and the low number of patients 9, 10, 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In three pilot studies involving 30, 25, and 35 cases of primary vulvar carcinoma of different stages, CD44v3 and CD44v6 were associated with poor prognosis 9, 10, 12. Another study examined the immunohistochemically detected expression of CD44 in vulvar carcinoma FIGO Stage I 11. A major shortcoming of these studies was the absence of the availability of a groin lymph node status11 and the low number of patients 9, 10, 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunohistochemic staining for CD44v3 and CD44v6 was performed as described previously 11. Widespread staining of > 50% of the tumor cells was interpreted as positive, staining of < 50% of the tumor cells was interpreted as negative (Figure 1A and B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to our findings, others have found significant associations between CD44v3 and tumour development or prognosis. [10][11][12] This inconsistency may be due to heterogeneity within the tumour itself, different standards for evaluating staining, or variations in antibody specificity or sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%