1993
DOI: 10.1177/172460089300800205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CEA and CA 15-3 in Pleural Effusion of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: Clinical Relevance and Diagnostic Value

Abstract: Serum and pleural effusion fluid were tested for CEA concentration in 83 advanced breast cancer patients, in 43 of whom CA 15-3 was also determined. All pleural effusions were clinically malignant. The sensitivity of the CEA test for the presence of pleural metastases was closer to that of the CA 15-3 test in effusion (0.59 and 0.79, respectively) than the sensitivity of CEA compared to CA 15-3 in serum (0.43 vs. 0.79). The use of two markers combined with cytology increased the diagnostic rate from 48% (cytol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After independent review, 75 publications on the role of pleural CEA concentrations in the diagnosis of MPE were considered to be eligible for inclusion in the analysis 21–95 . Of these publications, two were excluded because they recruited less than 10 patients in one of study groups, 69,70 four were excluded because the CEA concentration was determined only in patients with MPE, 71–74 16 were excluded because they included MPE and malignant peritoneal effusions as a single group, 75–90 two were excluded because they did not allow the calculation of sensitivity or specificity, 91,92 and three were excluded because the same authors published several reports on the same patients, and only the best‐quality study was considered 93–95 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After independent review, 75 publications on the role of pleural CEA concentrations in the diagnosis of MPE were considered to be eligible for inclusion in the analysis 21–95 . Of these publications, two were excluded because they recruited less than 10 patients in one of study groups, 69,70 four were excluded because the CEA concentration was determined only in patients with MPE, 71–74 16 were excluded because they included MPE and malignant peritoneal effusions as a single group, 75–90 two were excluded because they did not allow the calculation of sensitivity or specificity, 91,92 and three were excluded because the same authors published several reports on the same patients, and only the best‐quality study was considered 93–95 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%