1979
DOI: 10.1177/000348947908800206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cefazolin Prophylaxis in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery

Abstract: This study evaluated the prophylactic use of cefazolin in reducing the incidence of infection in patients undetgoing cancer surgery where the upper aerodigestive tract was entered from the neck. A prospective, randomized, double-blind design was conducted in a single hospital. The patient was given placebo or cefazolin, 1 gm intramuscularly with the preoperative medications, then 0.5 gm every six hours for four doses. Of 55 determinate patients, 32 received antibiotics and 23 placebo. Infection rate was 38% (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to international guidelines this prophylaxis is reported as able to control infective complications like pulmonary infections, wound infections, urinary tract infections and septic phlebitis. 7 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to international guidelines this prophylaxis is reported as able to control infective complications like pulmonary infections, wound infections, urinary tract infections and septic phlebitis. 7 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 In the attempt to minimise PP onset patients eligible for partial laryngeal surgery are carefully pre-selected upon pulmonary and performance status, nevertheless PP remains the most important and feared complication even in this selected population, despite antibiotic prophylaxis. 7 The aim of this study is to review our experience with supracricoid and supraglottic laryngectomies at our Institution over a 20 years period in a series of 416 consecutive patients, to investigate possible PP risk factors. Since several reports from other districts 8,9 suggest a possible PP prognostic significance, we also investigated the prognostic role of PP in our series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data suggest that: (1) Antibiotic prophylaxis reduced infection rates [12][13][14]; (2) beta-lactam antibiotics are appropriate first-line agents, with clindamycin reserved for patients with beta-lactam allergies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]; and (3) prolonged courses of antibiotics do not generally result in greater reduction of infection rates. [5,[20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without prophylaxis, the rate of wound infection ranges between 36 and 87% (2,4). Although numerous antimicrobial agents including synthetic penicillins, ureidopenicillins, clindamycin with or without an aminoglycoside, and various cephalosporins have been evaluated in this connection (5-8, 10, 11), there is no general agreement on the optimal regimen to recommend.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%