2018
DOI: 10.1037/com0000157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Celebrating the continued importance of “Machiavellian Intelligence” 30 years on.

Abstract: The question of what has shaped primates' (and other species') cognitive capacities, whether technical or social demands remains a hot topic of inquiry. Indeed, a key area of study within the field of comparative psychology in the last few decades has been the focus on social life as a driving force behind the evolution of cognition, studied from behavioral and neurological perspectives, and from theoretical and empirical perspectives. Reflecting on contemporary studies of primate social cognition specifically… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To succeed, this approach needs datasets that span a large number of species living in different ecological and social environments. Such datasets, however, are not readily available due to the logistic difficulties associated with testing large numbers of primates and, accordingly, little empirical research has explicitly tested these hypotheses (Hopper et al, 2018). Indeed, a recent review found that only a fraction of comparative primate cognition studies include more than two species (ManyPrimates, 2019a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To succeed, this approach needs datasets that span a large number of species living in different ecological and social environments. Such datasets, however, are not readily available due to the logistic difficulties associated with testing large numbers of primates and, accordingly, little empirical research has explicitly tested these hypotheses (Hopper et al, 2018). Indeed, a recent review found that only a fraction of comparative primate cognition studies include more than two species (ManyPrimates, 2019a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%