2012
DOI: 10.1177/0261927x12446614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Celebrating Thirty Years of the JLSP

Abstract: The Journal of Language and Social Psychology has been publishing articles for 30 years. In this article, three different kinds of analyses (viz., content codings, word clouds, and a textual procedure) examining trends over and between the three decades are reported. Drawing on these, future directions for the journal and the field in general are anticipated and proposed. Keywords social psychology of language, textual analysis, word clouds At this point in time and given the journal's substantive history, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Past research has emphasized the importance of understanding communication behaviors and their associated psychological processes by studying how communicative contexts influence individuals' communication styles (Culnan & Markus, 1987;Gasiorek et al, 2012;Walther, 1992Walther, , 2012Yzer & Southwell, 2008). Our study contributes to existing research by showing that social network size and density are associated with different psychological needs and lead to different emotional disclosure patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Past research has emphasized the importance of understanding communication behaviors and their associated psychological processes by studying how communicative contexts influence individuals' communication styles (Culnan & Markus, 1987;Gasiorek et al, 2012;Walther, 1992Walther, , 2012Yzer & Southwell, 2008). Our study contributes to existing research by showing that social network size and density are associated with different psychological needs and lead to different emotional disclosure patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The publicness, non-directness, and mixture of social circles make Facebook a complex social environment (Bazarova, Taft, Choi, & Cosley, 2013). As research has long recognized that communicative contexts can influence communication style (Culnan & Markus, 1987;Gasiorek, Giles, Holtgraves, & Robbins, 2012;Walther, 1992Walther, , 2012, it is likely that users' social network structure on Facebook will influence their emotional disclosure.…”
Section: Social Network Analysis: Size and Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our chosen data analysis method, centering resonance analysis, is purported to be a useful tool for analyzing large amounts of textual content [Gasiorek, Giles, Holtgraves and Robbins, 2012;Willis and Miertschin, 2010]. Centering resonance analysis is a means of text analysis based on noun phrases and has been used in studies across a variety of academic disciplines [Canary and Jennings, 2008;McLaren and Manatsa, 2011;Papacharissi and de Fatima Olivera, 2012;Rossetti, Handfield and Dooley, 2011].…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans naturally change the way they speak around the world because of the new environment they are in or the type of people with whom they surround themselves so that they, possibly as outside speakers, can blend in with the rest of their host society. CAT essentially explains how and why speakers make changes based on another speaker's behavior or perceived group belonging and how those changes in speaking are perceived (Gasiorek & Giles, 2012). When accommodating to ones' communication, speakers adjust their speaking behavior based on how they see someone else.…”
Section: Communication Accommodation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divergence can best be defined as speakers moving away from the communication style of the other speaker through a desire to be separate from the other communicator (Gasiorek & Giles, 2012). Speakers that diverge may wish to disengage from another speaker for several reasons such as simply wishing to speak and treat everyone similarly.…”
Section: Convergence and Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%