2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12115-010-9367-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Celebrity Culture

Abstract: Although the idea of a celebrity has been around for a long time, its mutation into an important cultural force is a relatively recent development. In recent decades the meaning of a celebrity has altered and is now often applied to those who are famous for being famous. The ascendancy of the celebrity has been fuelled by society's uneasy relationship with the question of authority. Often celebrity provides an alternative source of validation. The tendency to outsource authority to the celebrity represents an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
42
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A more integrated understanding of celebrities implies the distinction between an ascribed status based on bloodline or family relationships, an achieved celebrity status that originates from talent or accomplishments and the attributed celebrity (Rojek, 2012). The latter seems most in line with the contemporary type of celebrity, manufactured and made famous by media publicity alone (Furedi, 2010;Kerrigan et al, 2011;Lindridge and Eagar, 2015;Milner, 2010;Rojek, 2014;Turner, 2004).…”
Section: Celebritization Of Ceosmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more integrated understanding of celebrities implies the distinction between an ascribed status based on bloodline or family relationships, an achieved celebrity status that originates from talent or accomplishments and the attributed celebrity (Rojek, 2012). The latter seems most in line with the contemporary type of celebrity, manufactured and made famous by media publicity alone (Furedi, 2010;Kerrigan et al, 2011;Lindridge and Eagar, 2015;Milner, 2010;Rojek, 2014;Turner, 2004).…”
Section: Celebritization Of Ceosmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The fraying of the categorical terminology mirrors both the loss of accurate distinctions between human roles in post-modernism and the economic law that the demand for and manufacturing of new celebrities lead to new celebrity categories beyond movie stars, singers, entertainers or sports stars (Fillis, 2015;Furedi, 2010;Kerrigan et al, 2011;Lunardo et al, 2015;Moulard et al, 2015). Celebrity CEOs constitute an additional celebrity category that gains increasing attention in media and substantially impacts on business and society.…”
Section: Celebritization Of Ceosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the growing multidisciplinary literature on the rise of celebrity culture in late modern societies, two sets are of importance here: that which focuses on the celebrity as commodified individuality or 'personality brand' and his/her wider involvement in political culture (Goldman 1987;Graeber 2001;Marshall 2006;Bauman 2007;Jorgensen and Bang 2007;Zizek 2008;Furedi 2010;Marsh, 't Hart and Tindall 2010); and that on the relationship between celebrity advocacy and the growth of 'ethical'/'development' consumption (Cottle and Nolan 2007;Richey and Ponte 2008;Goodman 2008;West 2008;Harrison 2010;Biccum 2011;Ponte and Richey 2011).…”
Section: Celebrity Subjectivity Under Neoliberalism and The Humanitarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the recent literature draws attention to the burgeoning scale of celebrity involvement in wider social life and the consequent blurring of the boundaries between politics and popular culture (Furedi 2010;Marsh, 't Hart and Tindall 2010). Celebrities are said to have democratic currency because of their audience appeal, embodying the personification of Max Weber's 'charismatic individual' -as an alternative source of authority within society.…”
Section: Celebrity Subjectivity Under Neoliberalism and The Humanitarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation