1968
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(68)90135-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Celiac compression syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
3

Year Published

1971
1971
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the exception of 1 patient in the OG group who developed late thrombosis of her celiac stent, all patients with recurrent symptoms in both groups had less severe pain than at their initial presentation, and all had radiographic evidence of a widely patent CA postoperatively. This finding is more consistent with the pathophysiologic mechanism of neurogenic etiology favored by some authors, 6,7 and may be another reason to avoid routine CA revascularization in patients undergoing MAL division. This finding also conflicts with the findings in Reilly et al's 3 article in which the majority of patients with recurrent abdominal pain were found to have a stenosed or occluded CA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, with the exception of 1 patient in the OG group who developed late thrombosis of her celiac stent, all patients with recurrent symptoms in both groups had less severe pain than at their initial presentation, and all had radiographic evidence of a widely patent CA postoperatively. This finding is more consistent with the pathophysiologic mechanism of neurogenic etiology favored by some authors, 6,7 and may be another reason to avoid routine CA revascularization in patients undergoing MAL division. This finding also conflicts with the findings in Reilly et al's 3 article in which the majority of patients with recurrent abdominal pain were found to have a stenosed or occluded CA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Preceding studies have not identified any features of the clinical presentation that correlate with immediate or sustained symptom relief following op-* Rcfcrenccs 5,6,9,15,16,20,21,35. erative rcpair, ts'~7 In the present group of patients, however, long-term clinical improvcmcnt was more likely to occur in female patients who had a postprandial pain pattern and a weight loss of 20 pounds or more (Table VIII). If the patients wcrc older than 60 years, had atypical pain associated with long periods of symptom remission, and weight loss of less than 20 pounds, the likelihood of benefit from surg e u was considerably less (Table VIII).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reports were soon followed by a number of publications from various institutions around the world that documented variable but for the most part successful outcomes after treating this problem with decompression of the CA and correction of any intrinsic stenosis in the vessel when indicated. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The principle source of skepticism about CACS can be traced primarily to a publication in 1972 by a preeminent vascular surgeon of the time, D. Emerick Szilagyi, 13 as well as one by Brandt and Boley 14 published in 1978. The authors of these articles conceded that the bulk of the published literature reported largely successful outcomes with treating CA compression, and they introduced no meaningful data of their own to refute the diagnosis, yet they forcefully argued against the concept of CACS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%