1939
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1939.01990040158011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Celiac Disease Imitated by Giardiasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1941
1941
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical blockage of the brush border by numerous parasites was sug gested (33), but much of the brush border is not covered by organisms (26), the majority being unattached in the mucus layer. Mechanical irritation of mucosa by organisms may be important but has not been proven.…”
Section: (22)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical blockage of the brush border by numerous parasites was sug gested (33), but much of the brush border is not covered by organisms (26), the majority being unattached in the mucus layer. Mechanical irritation of mucosa by organisms may be important but has not been proven.…”
Section: (22)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection with Giardia may be associated with clinical and/or laboratory features suggestive of malabsorption, the extent of which is variable. This has been observed in children (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22), and in adults (21, 23 -32). Geographically, giardiasis-associated malabsorption in adults has a wider distribution than that associated with tropical sprue (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Even though the intimate mechanism of mucosal damage is still unclear (21,22), most of the evidence so far available would indicate that Giardia brings about a nonspecific damage to the mucosa of the infection site. This damage may be caused by mechanical covering of the mucosa by the parasite (23,24) or by the mucous barrier that it elicits (21), or by aggression of the mucosa with or without epithelial invasion (21,(25)(26)(27). In any event, therefore, it is not surprising that lactase activity [which is greater in the proximal areas of the small intestine (28,29)] is impaired .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%