2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4770(08)60545-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Affinity Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low recovery of bound A erythrocytes using this method was probably caused by a high surface concentration of HpA. The elution concentration of D-GalNAc in this study (30 mg/mL) is 15 times higher than what we found necessary to recover >90% of bound A erythrocytes from a commercial support, HpA-Sepharose 6MB, available from Pharmacia Biotech (Putnam et al, 1999). In addition to a higher amount of HpA used in the coupling step for magnetite (10 mg per 3 mL of sedimented support versus 3.6 mg per mL of sedimented Sepharose 6MB), the nonporous nature of magnetite compared to porous Sepharose likely led to a significantly higher HpA surface concentration.…”
Section: Erythrocyte Subpopulation Fractionation and Elutionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The low recovery of bound A erythrocytes using this method was probably caused by a high surface concentration of HpA. The elution concentration of D-GalNAc in this study (30 mg/mL) is 15 times higher than what we found necessary to recover >90% of bound A erythrocytes from a commercial support, HpA-Sepharose 6MB, available from Pharmacia Biotech (Putnam et al, 1999). In addition to a higher amount of HpA used in the coupling step for magnetite (10 mg per 3 mL of sedimented support versus 3.6 mg per mL of sedimented Sepharose 6MB), the nonporous nature of magnetite compared to porous Sepharose likely led to a significantly higher HpA surface concentration.…”
Section: Erythrocyte Subpopulation Fractionation and Elutionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Additionally, the HpA support facilitated the processing of approximately 1.1 × 10 9 cells in 2 h. The support was used four times without significant loss of activity. The processing rate of even this unoptimized system is comparable to packed bed CAC systems (Putnam et al, 1999).…”
Section: Erythrocyte Subpopulation Fractionation and Elutionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations