2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell boundary engineering of ferrous medium-entropy alloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion

Jeong Min Park,
Hyeonseok Kwon,
Jungho Choe
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To fully understand the cellular structure behaviors, there remains a question of how to quantitatively measure the misorientations between the sub-micro cellular structures. Unlike the traditional large-angle grain boundary, the misorientation across the cellular boundaries in LPBF 316L SS is usually very low, and the number of fractions is unavailable to be measured directly, especially when the ultra-low misorientation is smaller than 2 • using conventional electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD); however, line profiles of the misorientation angle and kernel average misorientation (KAM) map measured by EBSD analysis can indicate a misorientation smaller than 2 • [10,17,26,27]. Traditional techniques like EBSD associated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) require a large interaction volume between the electrons from the beam and the atoms of the materials, thereby lacking spatial resolution and causing inaccurate correspondence between the misorientation and dislocation cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fully understand the cellular structure behaviors, there remains a question of how to quantitatively measure the misorientations between the sub-micro cellular structures. Unlike the traditional large-angle grain boundary, the misorientation across the cellular boundaries in LPBF 316L SS is usually very low, and the number of fractions is unavailable to be measured directly, especially when the ultra-low misorientation is smaller than 2 • using conventional electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD); however, line profiles of the misorientation angle and kernel average misorientation (KAM) map measured by EBSD analysis can indicate a misorientation smaller than 2 • [10,17,26,27]. Traditional techniques like EBSD associated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) require a large interaction volume between the electrons from the beam and the atoms of the materials, thereby lacking spatial resolution and causing inaccurate correspondence between the misorientation and dislocation cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%