2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell encapsulation spatially alters crosslink density of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels formed from free-radical polymerizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of cells within the hydrogel precursor solution can also influence the photo cross-linking reaction and can impact on the mechanical properties of the hydrogel resin, 272 which in turn can result in decreased shape fidelity of the final constructs. However, to date, the effect of embedded cells on shape fidelity of bioresins for lithographic printing has received only little attention and additional research is required.…”
Section: Implications For Lithography-based Printing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of cells within the hydrogel precursor solution can also influence the photo cross-linking reaction and can impact on the mechanical properties of the hydrogel resin, 272 which in turn can result in decreased shape fidelity of the final constructs. However, to date, the effect of embedded cells on shape fidelity of bioresins for lithographic printing has received only little attention and additional research is required.…”
Section: Implications For Lithography-based Printing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of encapsulation, cells can sequester crosslinker molecules prior to polymerization which lowers the effective crosslink density and hence stiffness. [58] After encapsulation, secretion of MMPs can lead to rapid degradation of the hydrogel before the cells have time to differentiate and deposit their own ECM. [57,59] The modulus of the 3D-printed structure infilled with the soft hydrogel (i.e., the bone layer shown in Figure 1B) was 2.4 (0.5) MPa.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adhm202001226mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous natural and synthetic hydrogels have been successfully designed to enable cartilage restoration by providing a 3D microenvironment for chondrocytes or stem cells [ 7 ]. Many physical characteristics of hydrogels, such as stiffness [ 8 ], degradation profile [ 9 ], crosslinking density [ 10 ], and porous structure [ 11 , 12 ], play a pivotal role in cell behavior regulation and thus influence the efficacy of cartilage regeneration. Traditional dense bulk hydrogels do not meet the requirements for cartilage regeneration [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%