2011
DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.185785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Fate in the Arabidopsis Root Epidermis Is Determined by Competition between WEREWOLF and CAPRICE    

Abstract: The root hair and nonhair cells in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root epidermis are specified by a suite of transcriptional regulators. Two of these are WEREWOLF (WER) and CAPRICE (CPC), which encode MYB transcription factors that are required for promoting the nonhair cell fate and the hair cell fate, respectively. However, the precise function and relationship between these transcriptional regulators have not been fully defined experimentally. Here, we examine these issues by misexpressing the WER g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for CPC's negative action is provided by the nature of its gene product; CPC encodes a small protein with a single R3 Myb repeat with the bHLH-and DNA-binding domains but without a typical transcriptional activation domain (Wada et al, 1997). Consistent with this structure, CPC appears to inhibit the function of the WER-GL3/EGL3-TTG complex by interfering with WER binding to GL3/EGL3 in a competitive manner Tominaga et al, 2007;Song et al, 2011;Kang et al, 2013). Interestingly, CPC is capable of moving from cell-to-cell in the developing root, enabling it to act as a signaling molecule to repress non-hair cell fate specification in neighboring H cells (Kurata et al, 2005;Kang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Molecular Genetics Of Root Hair Cell Specificationmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A possible explanation for CPC's negative action is provided by the nature of its gene product; CPC encodes a small protein with a single R3 Myb repeat with the bHLH-and DNA-binding domains but without a typical transcriptional activation domain (Wada et al, 1997). Consistent with this structure, CPC appears to inhibit the function of the WER-GL3/EGL3-TTG complex by interfering with WER binding to GL3/EGL3 in a competitive manner Tominaga et al, 2007;Song et al, 2011;Kang et al, 2013). Interestingly, CPC is capable of moving from cell-to-cell in the developing root, enabling it to act as a signaling molecule to repress non-hair cell fate specification in neighboring H cells (Kurata et al, 2005;Kang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Molecular Genetics Of Root Hair Cell Specificationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Although the protein sequence does not provide a clear mechanistic understanding of its role, TTG is able to physically interact with the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcriptional activators GL3 and EGL3, which act in a partially functionally redundant manner (Bernhardt et al 2003). GL3 and EGL3 also physically interact with WER (Bernhardt et al, 2003;Song et al, 2011), which implies that a tripartite transcription factor complex is responsible for directing the non-hair cell fate.…”
Section: Molecular Genetics Of Root Hair Cell Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WER/ MYB23 and EGL3/GL3 proteins appear to participate in a multimeric transcriptional regulatory complex with the TTG WD-repeat protein to induce non-hair cell differentiation, as well as expression of the TRY/CPC one-repeat Mybs (Lee and Schiefelbein, 1999;Ryu et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2008). The family of one-repeat Mybs engages in a lateral inhibition mechanism by moving from cell to cell and hindering formation of the MYB23/WER-EGL3/GL3-TTG complex, which permits expression of hair cell differentiation genes (Wada et al, 1997;Schellmann et al, 2002;Kurata et al, 2005;Tominaga et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2007Wang et al, , 2008Song et al, 2011). The relative abundance of the MYB23/WER-EGL3/GL3-TTG transcriptional complex in the presumptive hair cells and non-hair cells of the developing root epidermis appears to be controlled by cell position-dependent SCRAMBLED receptor kinase signaling (Kwak et al, 2005;Kwak and Schiefelbein, 2008;Savage et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Идентичность ПЦ и окружающих его инициалей, а также радиальное структурирование корня зависят от транскрипционных факторов SHORTROOT (SHR) и SCARECROW (SCR), взаимодействующих с белками JACKDAW (JKD) и MAGPIE (MGP) (Wildwater et al, 2005;Ogasawara et al, 2011). Спецификация судьбы эпидермаль-ных корневых клеток связана с транскрипционными фак-торами WEREWOLF (WER), GLABRA2 (GL2), GLABRA3 (GL3), ENHANCER OF GLABRA3 (EGL3) и CAPRICE (CPC) (Song et al, 2011) и межклеточным сообщением, опосредованным двумя рецепторными киназами (ACR4 и CLV1) и сигнальным пептидом CLAVATA3 (CLV3) (Stahl et al, 2013). Рецепторная киназа SCRAMBLED (SCM) обра батывает позиционные сигналы дифференцировки эпидермальных клеток в корне (Kwak, Schiefelbein, 2007.…”
unclassified