1997
DOI: 10.2187/bss.11.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell growth and morphology of Dictyostelium discoideum in space environment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting stalk is very fragile and difficult to lift from the agar. In wild-type cells, gravitation has little effect on fruiting body formation (16). In roco4-null cells, we observed by putting the agar plates upside down that morphogenesis of a hanging fruiting body is very much improved, even though stalks are defective in cellulose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The resulting stalk is very fragile and difficult to lift from the agar. In wild-type cells, gravitation has little effect on fruiting body formation (16). In roco4-null cells, we observed by putting the agar plates upside down that morphogenesis of a hanging fruiting body is very much improved, even though stalks are defective in cellulose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In contrast, microgravity depressed cell killing in microorganisms of Micrococcus radiodurans (Kobayashi et al 1996). On the other hand, many reports described no observable effects from microgravity on space radiation (Harada et al, 1997(Harada et al, , 1998a(Harada et al, , 1998bOhnishi et al, 1997. Such systems include DNA repair in Escherichia coli, chemical reactions involved in rejoining activity during the repair of double strand breaks by DNA ligase (Takahashi et al, 2000), and mutation frequencies generated by chemical reactions involved in DNA polymerase repair of damaged template DNA.…”
Section: Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the assessment and management of human health risks in space, it is necessary to obtain more basic data of the combined effects on radiation under microgravity. The diverse biological effects of space radiation have been reported such as: (i) there was no significant difference in the results between the space samples and ground samples (Bender et al, 1968;Horneck et al, 1997;Ohnishi et al, 1997;Pross and Kiefer, 1999;Takahashi et al, 2001Takahashi et al, , 2000Takahashi et al, , 1997; (ii) enhancing effects were induced in the presence of microgravity and space radiation (Bücker et al, 1986;Gao et al, 2015;Ikenaga et al, 1997;Xu et al, 2014); and (iii) suppressing effects (i.e., recovery from radiation damage was enhanced under microgravity) have also been observed (Kobayashi et al, 1996). These controversial data (Yatagai and Ishioka, 2014) may be the result of the diversity of biological experimental systems flown on spacecraft and restrictions concerning replicate experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%