Evidence that hepatoma cell lines show differential expression of concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNT1 and CNT2) prompted us to study the transporter proteins in 2 models of hepatocarcinogenesis, the chemically induced Solt and Farber model and the albumin-SV40 large T antigen (Alb-SV40) transgenic rat. CNT1 expression was lower in tumor biopsy specimens from Alb-SV40 rat livers than in normal tissue. Immunocytochemistry revealed that the CNT1 protein was indeed absent in the tumor lesions. CNT1 was also absent in a cell line, L25, derived from the Alb-SV40 transgenic rat liver tumors, whereas another cell line, L37, derived from the normal-appearing parenchyma, retained the expression of both carrier isoforms. The protein expression correlated with the nucleoside transport properties of these cell lines. Moreover, although CNT2 expression was highly dependent on the growth characteristics of the 2 cell lines, as was CNT1 (albeit to a lower extent) in L37 cells, it was not expressed in L25 cells at any stage of cell growth. In contrast to the transgenic model of hepatocarcinogenesis, in the chemically induced tumors the expression of CNT2 was lower, although still detectable. In summary, these data indicate that hepatocarcinogenesis leads to a selective loss or diminished expression of nucleoside carrier isoforms, a feature that may be relevant to our understanding of the molecular basis of the bioavailability of those drugs that are nucleoside derivatives and may be substrates of these carriers. The transport properties and isoform-expression profile of the L25 and L37 cell lines make them suitable hepatocyte culture models with which to study nucleoside transport processes and drug sensitivity. (HEPATOLOGY 2000;32:239-246.)Nucleoside and nucleobase derivatives, such as fluorouracil, cytarabine, fludarabine, cladribine, and gemcitabine, are currently used in the treatment of a variety of hematopoietic malignancies as well as in the chemotherapy of solid tumors. 1,2 Drug bioavailability may rely on the translocation of these prodrugs across the plasma membrane. Thus, the molecular characterization of the carrier proteins involved in the uptake of nucleosides and nucleoside analogs, a long awaited goal, has recently been achieved by several laboratories. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Four isoforms of nucleoside transporters from rat and human tissues have been identified. [3][4][5][6][7][8] The complementary DNAs (cDNAs) responsible for the concentrative Na ϩ -dependent pyrimidine-(CNT1) and purine-preferring (CNT2 or SPNT) nucleoside transport respectively have been cloned, 3,4,8 as have the broad-specificity nitrobenzylthioinosine-sensitive (ENT1) and -insensitive (ENT2) nucleoside equilibrative transporters. 5-7 These transporters are major routes for the uptake of nucleoside derivatives. 3,5,9,10 Nucleoside transport in liver was initially characterized in plasma membrane vesicles 11-13 and appeared to be up-regulated by insulin and during the early phase of liver growth after partial hepatectomy 14,15 consistent...