1978
DOI: 10.3233/bir-1978-153-419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-membrane and rheological mechanisms: dynamic osmotic hemolysis of human erythrocytes and repair of ghosts, as studied by resistive pulse spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows data from our laboratory on osmotic volume changes of erythrocytes subjected t o different concentrations of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solutions. These are plotted, for comparison, in the same normalized form as that used for Figure 1 fitted by the curve correspond to the raw, "measured" volumes of red cells, as directly obtained under "slowflow" conditions through the orifice (about 1 dsec), using resistive pulse spectroscopy (RPS), an extension of the Coulter counter methodology (Me1 and Yee, 1975;Yee and Mel, 1978). The solid points and associated straight line represent the "true" volumes, after having quantitatively corrected the "measured' volumes for shape factor, according to the method of Richieri et al (1985a,b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows data from our laboratory on osmotic volume changes of erythrocytes subjected t o different concentrations of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solutions. These are plotted, for comparison, in the same normalized form as that used for Figure 1 fitted by the curve correspond to the raw, "measured" volumes of red cells, as directly obtained under "slowflow" conditions through the orifice (about 1 dsec), using resistive pulse spectroscopy (RPS), an extension of the Coulter counter methodology (Me1 and Yee, 1975;Yee and Mel, 1978). The solid points and associated straight line represent the "true" volumes, after having quantitatively corrected the "measured' volumes for shape factor, according to the method of Richieri et al (1985a,b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume increase is of the same magnitude when measured either from GA-fixed cells or from SEM micrographs. The maximal volume increase of 60-62",, in 0.34",, NaCl is smaller than the 78",, measured by a haematocrit method (Seeman et al, 1969), 74",, measured on an interference microscope (Evans & Fung, 1972) or 67",, measured on a resistive pulse spectroscope (Yee & Mel, 1978).…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has yielded a better understanding of the shapes of red blood cells induced by ageing (Chailley et al, 1973), drugs (Sheetz & Singer, 1974;Fujii et al, 1979) or various osmotic (Metz et al, 1971;Bleau et al, 1975;Yee & Mel, 1978) or pathological conditions (Bessis & Weed, 1972;Kupari-Koby, 1976). Both SEM and high-voltage electron microscopy can also be used when visualizing the ultrastructure of haemolysed erythrocytes ('ghosts') (Sprandel et al, 1981;Wise et al, 1981), but SEM has seldom been used in quantitative studies on red blood cell geometry, such as the determination of the area and volume of discocytes (Ghosh, 1971;Leblond & Shoucri, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean particle size was calculated as outlined elsewhere (23). Apparent particle size using resistive pulse analysis is affected principally by the size of the particles, and by their shape and deformability (24). Since the shape of the red cell in the hypotonic solu-tions employed is close to spherical, no specific correction was made for the shape factor; aberration due to variable deformability was excluded by fixing the red cells prior to particle sizing in glutaraldehyde 0.125% at the osmolality used for including haemolysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d). The peak of the volume/osmolality curve is taken as the maximum volume to which the cells can swell(22,24).The peaks of the curves obtained with hypotonic saline solutions containing 0.07, 2.2 and 4.4 mmol/l Ca2+ are shown inFig-ure 5: at a Ca2+ concentration of 2.2 mmol/l or greater the peak is significantly shifted to a lower osmolality than in saline alone. At 2.2 mmol/l Ca2+ the critical volume is unchanged, but it is slightly diminished at 4.4 mmol/l Ca2+.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%