1983
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.1041170107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell membrane potential changes follow epstein‐barr virus binding

Abstract: Upon binding to receptor-bearing target cells, viruses cause cell membrane potential changes. Epstein-Barr Virus causes a biphasic membrane potential change in receptor-bearing B lymphocytes but not receptor-negative T lymphocytes, as measured by flow cytometry or cyanine dye uptake. Membrane potential changes from EBV binding to receptor-bearing cells resemble electrical responses of other cells following ligand binding to transmembrane receptors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional support for this concept is provided by the fact that virions modify membrane potential during entry (Fuchs and Kohn, 1983;Rosenthal and Shapiro, 1983;Seth et al, 1985;Bashford et al, 1985), probably as a consequence of the capacity of virion proteins to form ion channels Spruce et al, 1991;Tosteson et al, 1993). In addition, SFV does not enter cells when the membrane potential is abolished by modifying the concentration of monovalent cations, even under acidic conditions (Helenius et al, 1985).…”
Section: A Proton Motive Model To Account For Virus Entry and Earmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional support for this concept is provided by the fact that virions modify membrane potential during entry (Fuchs and Kohn, 1983;Rosenthal and Shapiro, 1983;Seth et al, 1985;Bashford et al, 1985), probably as a consequence of the capacity of virion proteins to form ion channels Spruce et al, 1991;Tosteson et al, 1993). In addition, SFV does not enter cells when the membrane potential is abolished by modifying the concentration of monovalent cations, even under acidic conditions (Helenius et al, 1985).…”
Section: A Proton Motive Model To Account For Virus Entry and Earmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional support for this concept is provided by the fact that virions modify membrane potential during entry (Fuchs and Kohn, 1983;Rosenthal and Shapiro, 1983;Seth et al, 1985;Bashford et al, 1985), probably as a consequence of the capacity of virion proteins to form ion channels Spruce et al, 1991;Tosteson et al, 1993). In addition, SFV does not enter cells when the membrane potential is abolished by modifying the concentration of monovalent cations, even under acidic conditions (Helenius et al, 1985).…”
Section: A Proton Motive Model To Account For Virus Entry and Earmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of membrane potential in bacterial conjugation is currently unknown, but one can hypothesize that it may act, via the pilus, as the 'mating signal', i.e., the signal (nature unknown) thought to pass between donor and recipient and to act as a trigger for the conjugal process [4]. This concept is particularly attractive given the growing body of evidence that membrane potentials are involved in a variety of contact phenomena, e.g., phage-bacterium contact [5] and the binding of viruses to mammalian cells [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%