We have determined the DNA content, the ploidy levels, and the percentages of different cell types present in small and large mouse mammary tumors as well as in young and old mouse livers by using absorption and flow cytometry. Absorption cytometry data indicated a significant increase in the proportion of transformed GO/G1 cells in the tumors as compared to that of the stromal GO/Gl cells with progressive tumor growth. This increase was not detected by flow cytometry. In both young and old mouse livers, a small number of cells of higher ploidy (8C and 1 6 0 were detected by absorption cytometry but were not apparent in histograms obtained by flow cytomRecently, there has been considerable interest in the quantitative analysis of cellular DNA content for investigations as to whether the ploidy levels and cell cycle distributions of malignant tumors correlate with clinical outcome (6)(7)(8)13,14,18). Early studies performed with absorption cytometry showed that aneuploid DNA content was associated with malignancy (6,10,11). Such measurements, however, were time consuming and often inaccurate because of optical errors in the measuring system (10,111. With the introduction of flow cytometry, measurements of the DNA content in cells of a large number of samples from different sources have become much more rapid. In this technique, cells or nuclei are stained with fluorochromes such as propidium iodide (PI) or ethidium bromide (EB), which fluoresce in direct proportion to the amount of double-stranded nucleic acid present. The samples are then analyzed for the amount of fluorescence per particle. The relative amount of DNA per cell is usually calculated by reference to the fluorescence of a known internal standard (17,21).etry. Furthermore, changes in the proportions of liver cells of different ploidy with age were apparent in absorption cytometry data but not in flow cytometry data. In one mouse liver experiment, a 6C cell peak appeared in the flow cytometry histogram, but a direct measurement of DNA content by absorption cytometry failed to detect cells with such a peak. We therefore believe that some caution may be warranted in the use of flow cytometry alone for evaluation of DNA distributions and of the proportions of different types of cells in complex solid tissues.Key terms: Absorption cytometry, flow cytometry, DNA content, cell ploidy It was also found that the coefficients of variation (CVs) in the DNA measurements of GO/G1 tumor cells made by flow cytometry (12,20) were, in general, lower than those of the results reported when similar cells were measured with the early absorption cytometry techniques (22). The rapidity and ease of performance of flow cytometry, coupled with the relatively low GO/ G1 CVs (which were attributed to increased "accuracy"), soon established flow cytometry as the standard method for quantitating cellular DNA content. There was still concern by some, however, that errors, caused by measurement of nonviable debris, could lead to false peaks or other gross errors in the DNA distri...