1982
DOI: 10.2172/6808326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-module and fuel-conditioner development. Final report, October 1979-January 1982

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to uncertainties in the catalyst parameters or the heat transfer. These model calculations used a heat transfer coefficient double that of eq 25, as suggested by the analyses of Hoover et al (1980). Given the close agreement of the temperature profiles, the heat-transfer coefficients appear to be in the right range.…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to uncertainties in the catalyst parameters or the heat transfer. These model calculations used a heat transfer coefficient double that of eq 25, as suggested by the analyses of Hoover et al (1980). Given the close agreement of the temperature profiles, the heat-transfer coefficients appear to be in the right range.…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiative heat transfer effects are not included in the model. Hoover et al (1980) analyzed both convective and radiative heat transfer to a fuel cell reformer tube under otherwise identical conditions and concluded there was little difference between the two cases (<20 °F difference in wall temperature). Additionally, the compact spacing of fuel cell reformer tubes and the high flow rates of relatively "low" temperature (2000-2500 °F) gas past the tubes would minimize any radiation effects present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%