2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-nuclear data reduction and prognostic model selection in bladder tumor recurrence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing prediction methods rely on clinicopathological data, which are often insufficient, thus emphasizing the need for an affordable, rapid, reproducible, and effective technique. CPATH has the potential to predict clinical outcomes by analyzing tumor growth patterns, cell nuclei, and microenvironments [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existing prediction methods rely on clinicopathological data, which are often insufficient, thus emphasizing the need for an affordable, rapid, reproducible, and effective technique. CPATH has the potential to predict clinical outcomes by analyzing tumor growth patterns, cell nuclei, and microenvironments [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor cell nuclei undergo significant changes, and when quantified, these modifications can diagnose cancer or predict the disease’s course [ 58 ]. ML-based CPATH methodologies that evaluate cellular features show promising potential in predicting cancer recurrence and survival [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]. The mutually analyzed cellular features were mostly cell nuclear area, skewness of area, and circularity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simple logistic regression test result (Table 2) indicates that age, weight, BMI and all of the analyzed BIA parameters produced signi¯cant e®ects (p < 0:25) on TC level in blood, however gender and variables were not predictors to TC level in blood at ( p > 0: 25).…”
Section: Arti¯cial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Four techniques were considered in the training process; the gradient descent with momentum method (GDMBP), 22 the resilient method (RBP), 25 the scaled conjugate gradient method (SCGBP) 26 and the LevenbergÀMarquardt method (LMBP). 22 The crossvalidation process mentioned above was performed for the each of the four di®erent algorithms.…”
Section: Arti¯cial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%