2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01165-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
401
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 496 publications
(439 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
33
401
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, a larger contact area has been correlated with a higher number of focal adhesions per cell and demonstrated the promotion of osteogenic differentiation via RhoA mediated actin‐myosin generated tension 22, 29. This, however, does not explain our observations where osteogenic differentiation was higher on convex structures compared to flat and concave structures: The number of focal adhesions per cell did not differ significantly between convex and flat structures (Figure 3B) and the F‐actin signal was even lower on convex compared to concave surfaces (Figure 4E,F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In previous studies, a larger contact area has been correlated with a higher number of focal adhesions per cell and demonstrated the promotion of osteogenic differentiation via RhoA mediated actin‐myosin generated tension 22, 29. This, however, does not explain our observations where osteogenic differentiation was higher on convex structures compared to flat and concave structures: The number of focal adhesions per cell did not differ significantly between convex and flat structures (Figure 3B) and the F‐actin signal was even lower on convex compared to concave surfaces (Figure 4E,F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…dynamics of focal adhesions, and we propose that this impairment in focal adhesion numbers and lengths, observed on NS, reduces the ability of cells to spread above the threshold required for cell cycle progression and survival. 17,18,26,27 Although lower adhesion numbers and lengths were observed on TS, the percentage of adhesions below 1 mm in length was low, and overall cell shape was not affected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These measurements might indicate that the lower number and length groupings for the focal adhesions of cells on NS compared to TS could dip below a certain threshold value required for spreading and proliferation on the surface. 17,18 Lower amounts of focal adhesions have also been linked to an increase in cell migration, tying in with the polarized cell morphology. 19 The microtubule network for cells on the three smooth surfaces and TS were clearly defined and extended to all areas of the cell body with no visible influence from the underlying topography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the growth of FAs in response to Rho activation appears to be due to an increase of force on the adhesion, because FAs will also grow when physical force is applied to the cell by stretching it [21,22]. Likewise, if force on an adhesion is decreased, the adhesion will disassemble [23,24]. This basic mechanism of reinforcement in response to an increase in force, and release in response to a decrease in force, is a fundamental property of FAs that plays an important role in several physiological processes of the cell such as migration and proliferation.…”
Section: Adhesion and The Development Of Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%