2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Analysis Using Microfluidics

Abstract: The papers included in this Review were published between September 2015 and September 2017. The material was compiled using several strategies including extensive searches using Scifinder, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The contents of high impact journals were also scanned, including Analytical Chemistry, Lab-on-a-Chip, Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Applied Physics Letters, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Angewandte Chemie, Nano Letters, Science, Biomedical Microdevices… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the development of the PDMS‐based soft lithography technique two decades ago , microfluidic devices have been extensively used to focus , trap , concentrate , and separate particles (varying from nano to micro, biological to synthetic, rigid to soft, etc.) for many biomedical, chemical, and environmental applications . Compared to their macroscopic counterparts, microfluidic devices have the following advantages: precise fluid control because of the small Reynolds number flow; low sample consumption because of the small volume of microchannels; accurate particle manipulation because of the strong confinement effect (as a result of the comparable particle and channel sizes), and as well the small Reynolds number, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the development of the PDMS‐based soft lithography technique two decades ago , microfluidic devices have been extensively used to focus , trap , concentrate , and separate particles (varying from nano to micro, biological to synthetic, rigid to soft, etc.) for many biomedical, chemical, and environmental applications . Compared to their macroscopic counterparts, microfluidic devices have the following advantages: precise fluid control because of the small Reynolds number flow; low sample consumption because of the small volume of microchannels; accurate particle manipulation because of the strong confinement effect (as a result of the comparable particle and channel sizes), and as well the small Reynolds number, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to pavement and basal cells, the trichomes of Arabidopsis thaliana contained higher levels of metabolites from the kaempferol glycoside biosynthesis pathway ( Zhang et al, 2014 ). Selectively analyzing specialized single plant cells, e.g., parenchyma cells, guard cells, trichomes, and excretory idioblasts ( Foster, 1956 ; Valverde et al, 2001 ; Labhsetwar et al, 2014 ; Misra et al, 2015 ; Sibbitts et al, 2018 ) can provide insight into the biochemical processes and regulatory networks associated with their function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most biological experiments rely on bulk analysis that report on large cell population averages (millions of cells) and mask the presence of subpopulations, rare cells, and individual cellular variations. Measuring the distribution and the magnitude of biological noise is increasingly feasible through single cell analysis techniques, including fluorescence ( Paige et al, 2012 ), microfluidics ( Sibbitts et al, 2018 ), and Raman scattering ( Kuku et al, 2017 ). The limited size and volume of single cells, and the low copy numbers of certain analytes make detection, identification, and quantitation challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present review, we focused primarily our attention on the use of ME for drug discovery and development and in preclinical toxicology studies, its application for the analysis of bulk and single cells, for the detection of biomarkers in biological fluids, as well as for monitoring neurotransmitters in vitro and in vivo. For further discussion of applications and advances in ME (and CE) see the recent review written by Sibbitts et al [136] and Ragab and Kimary [137].…”
Section: Me For Separation and Quantification Of Neurotransmitters Inmentioning
confidence: 99%