Gradient sensing requires at least two measurements at different points in space. These measurements must then be communicated to a common location to be compared, which is unavoidably noisy. Although much is known about the limits of measurement precision by cells, the limits placed by the communication are not understood. Motivated by recent experiments, we derive the fundamental limits to the precision of gradient sensing in a multicellular system, accounting for communication and temporal integration. The gradient is estimated by comparing a "local" and a "global" molecular reporter of the external concentration, where the global reporter is exchanged between neighboring cells. Using the fluctuation-dissipation framework, we find, in contrast to the case when communication is ignored, that precision saturates with the number of cells independently of the measurement time duration, because communication establishes a maximum length scale over which sensory information can be reliably conveyed. Surprisingly, we also find that precision is improved if the local reporter is exchanged between cells as well, albeit more slowly than the global reporter. The reason is that whereas exchange of the local reporter weakens the comparison, it decreases the measurement noise. We term such a model "regional excitation-global inhibition." Our results demonstrate that fundamental sensing limits are necessarily sharpened when the need to communicate information is taken into account. C ells sense spatial gradients in environmental chemicals with remarkable precision. A single amoeba, for example, can respond to a difference of roughly 10 attractant molecules between the front and the back of the cell (1). Cells are even more sensitive when they are in a group: Cultures of many neurons respond to chemical gradients equivalent to a difference of only one molecule across an individual neuron's axonal growth cone (2), clusters of malignant lymphocytes have a wider chemotactic sensitivity than single cells (3), and groups of communicating epithelial cells detect gradients that are too weak for a single cell to detect (4). More generally, collective chemosensing properties are often very distinct from those in individual cells (3, 5-7). These observations have generated a renewed interest in the question of what sets the fundamental limit to the precision of gradient sensing in large, spatially extended, often collective sensory systems.Fundamentally, sensing a stationary gradient requires at least two measurements to be made at different points in space. The precision of these two or more individual measurements bounds the gradient sensing precision (8, 9). In its turn, each individual measurement is limited by the finite number of molecules within the detector volume and the ability of the detector to integrate over time, a point first made by Berg and Purcell (BP) (8). More detailed calculations of gradient sensing by specific geometries of receptors have since confirmed that the precision of gradient sensing remains limited by ...