2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3883639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Architecture of Human Brain Metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene Ontology analysis confirmed distinct functions across the Mo/Mg‐TAM subsets (supplementary material, Figure S4D). Thus, as recently reported in TAMs from human brain metastases [24], the functional states of ontogenically different TAMs in brain tumours could be more complex than the prototypical M1 (pro‐inflammatory) or M2 (immunosuppressive) paradigm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Gene Ontology analysis confirmed distinct functions across the Mo/Mg‐TAM subsets (supplementary material, Figure S4D). Thus, as recently reported in TAMs from human brain metastases [24], the functional states of ontogenically different TAMs in brain tumours could be more complex than the prototypical M1 (pro‐inflammatory) or M2 (immunosuppressive) paradigm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…One other limitation in this study is the limited number of cases per group that restricts our capabilities to demonstrate specific characteristics for cancer types and subtypes. This type of analysis does not lend itself to high-volume throughput of specimens (65). In fact, patients with high-grade cancer are exposed to multiple regimens of therapies, which makes it a challenge to have comparable patient groups with higher number of patients between primary and metastatic brain cancers.…”
Section: Jcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But cancer and non‐cancer constituents of the TME surely communicate among one another contemporaneously and bidirectionally, just as microglia, astrocytes, and immune cells cooperate to address brain injury. High‐resolution omics technologies are starting to reveal a dense web of interactions between cell types in MBM at unprecedented spatial and molecular detail (Lawson et al 2018, Smalley et al 2021, Gonzalez et al 2022).…”
Section: Molecular Determinants Of Melanoma Brain Metastasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But cancer and non-cancer constituents of the TME surely communicate among one another contemporaneously and bidirectionally, just as microglia, astrocytes, and immune cells cooperate to address brain injury. High-resolution omics technologies are starting to reveal a dense web of interactions between cell types in MBM at unprecedented spatial and molecular detail(Lawson et al 2018, Smalley et al 2021, Gonzalez et al 2022.The relative geographic orientation of the cells of the TME has biological import in other malignancies and may therefore represent a dimension of information worth exploring in MBM. For example, glioblastoma cells exhibit distinct phenotypes across the tumor's "heterogeneous landscape of cell populations"(Comba et al 2021); proximity to synapses allows breast cancer brain metastatic cells to engage with neurons where astrocytes usually do(Zeng et al 2019);…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%