2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.81.016105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular automaton model of damage

Abstract: We investigate the role of equilibrium methods and stress transfer range in describing the process of damage. We find that equilibrium approaches are not applicable to the description of damage and the catastrophic failure mechanism if the stress transfer is short ranged. In the long range limit, equilibrium methods apply only if the healing mechanism associated with ruptured elements is instantaneous. Furthermore we find that the nature of the catastrophic failure depends strongly on the stress transfer range… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ρ=3 the failure takes place at ν 0 t gf =1/3 and for ρ=6 at ν 0 t gf =1/6 as predicted by Eq. (14). The behavior for the two values of ρ is quite similar except for the reduction in the time to failure for larger ρ as well as a sharper transition from nucleation to propagation.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For ρ=3 the failure takes place at ν 0 t gf =1/3 and for ρ=6 at ν 0 t gf =1/6 as predicted by Eq. (14). The behavior for the two values of ρ is quite similar except for the reduction in the time to failure for larger ρ as well as a sharper transition from nucleation to propagation.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In particular, we compare values of scaling exponents we obtain from the simulations to values for mean-field percolation and spinodal nucleation. We also place our results into the context of other recent work on similar models, with particular attention to the question of punctuated ergodicity [32,8,33,34] which has been observed in both models as well as in natural earthquake fault systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, the RJB model is advantageous to research the basic physical principles contributing to earthquake scaling laws due to its simple rules, ease of programming and speed of simulations. For these reasons it has often been used to test additional physical principles, such as damage and threshold weakening (Serino et al 2010; Gran et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%