Differences in the time course of repolarization of the three predominant myocardial cell types have been shown to contribute to the inscription of the T wave of the electrocardiogram (ECG). Voltage gradients developing as a result of the different time course of repolarization of phases 2 and 3 in the three cell types give rise to opposing voltage gradients on either side of the M region, which are in part responsible for the inscription of the T wave. 1 In the case of an upright T wave, the epicardial response is the earliest to repolarize and the M cell action potential is the latest. In the coronary-perfused wedge preparation, repolarization of the epicardial action potential coincides with the peak of the T wave and repolarization of the M cells is coincident with the end of the T wave, so that the interval from the peak to the end of the T wave provides a measure of transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR).Based on these early studies, the Tpeak-Tend interval in precordial ECG leads was suggested to provide an index of transmural dispersion of repolarization. 2 More recent studies have also provided guidelines for the estimation of transmural dispersion of repolarization in the case of more complex T waves, including negative, biphasic and triphasic T waves. 3 In such cases, the interval from the nadir of the first component of the T wave to the end of the T wave was shown to provide an electrocardiographic approximation of TDR.While these relationships are relatively straight forward in the coronary-perfused wedge preparation, extrapolation to the surface ECG recorded in vivo must be approached with great caution and will require careful validation. The Tpeak-Tend interval is unlikely to provide an absolute measure of transmural dispersion in vivo, as elegantly demonstrated by Xia and coworkers 4 . However, changes in this parameter are thought to be capable of reflecting changes in spatial dispersion of repolarization, particularly TDR, and thus may be prognostic of arrhythmic risk under a variety of conditions. 5-10 Takenaka et al. recently demonstrated exercise-induced accentuation of the Tpeak-Tend interval in LQT1 patients, but not LQT2. 9