2016
DOI: 10.1111/andr.12185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular correlates of selfish spermatogonial selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the recent concepts about de novo mutations -different from the idea of accumulation of copy errors only -is the 'selfish spermatogonial selection' hypothesis. It suggests that de novo mutations in genes for tyrosine kinase receptors, such as the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2; found in patients with Apert syndrome) or its paralog FGFR3 (found in cases of achondroplasia) offer a selective advantage to spermatogonia carrying this mutation, causing their clonal expansion (Goriely et al 2009, Maher et al 2016.…”
Section: R91mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the recent concepts about de novo mutations -different from the idea of accumulation of copy errors only -is the 'selfish spermatogonial selection' hypothesis. It suggests that de novo mutations in genes for tyrosine kinase receptors, such as the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2; found in patients with Apert syndrome) or its paralog FGFR3 (found in cases of achondroplasia) offer a selective advantage to spermatogonia carrying this mutation, causing their clonal expansion (Goriely et al 2009, Maher et al 2016.…”
Section: R91mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B 371: 20150137 that parameters can be inferred under one model or another, but the fact that including an active role for the A d cells allows models which are compatible both with long-standing observations of the seminiferous epithelium and with recent measurements of the paternal age effect. More sophisticated models might also include feedback or global regulation mechanisms other than cell death [52,55], age-related changes in cell-division mutation rate and spermiogenetic efficiency, and perhaps phenomena such as selfish spermatogonial selection [65]. At present, experimental data are limited, but more extensive data including trio sequencing on population-wide scales will provide a better basis for exploration of spermatogenetic models along these or similar lines.…”
Section: Changes In the Structure Of Spermatogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this model, spermatogonia carrying specific pathogenic mutations gain a selection/growth advantage over non‐mutated spermatogonia which leads to an increased number of mutated spermatogonia in the testis. Consequently, with increasing age, more mutated spermatozoa are produced, and thus, it becomes more likely to pass such mutations to the offspring (Goriely & Wilkie, ; Maher et al ., ). These ageing‐associated clonal drift models in which advantageous (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%