2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.075110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular dynamical mean-field theory for the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model

Abstract: We explore the use of exact diagonalization methods for solving the self-consistent equations of the cellular dynamical mean field theory for the one-dimensional regular and extended Hubbard models. We investigate the nature of the Mott transition and convergence of the method as a function of cluster size as well as the optimal allocation of computational resources between bath and ''cluster-impurity'' sites, with a view to develop a renormalization group method in higher dimensions. We assess the performance… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now discuss the one-dimensional Hubbard model, for which exact results are available from the Bethe ansatz 22 and which has been studied with CDMFT using Lanczos [11][12][13] and quantum Monte Carlo, 23 as well as with the variational cluster approximation. 24 Here going from single-site DMFT to a cluster description makes a qualitative difference; for a paramagnetic single-site calculation antiferromagnetism is completely suppressed, while on a cluster we will have short-ranged antiferromagnetic correlations, even if we impose a paramagnetic bath.…”
Section: Hubbard Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We now discuss the one-dimensional Hubbard model, for which exact results are available from the Bethe ansatz 22 and which has been studied with CDMFT using Lanczos [11][12][13] and quantum Monte Carlo, 23 as well as with the variational cluster approximation. 24 Here going from single-site DMFT to a cluster description makes a qualitative difference; for a paramagnetic single-site calculation antiferromagnetism is completely suppressed, while on a cluster we will have short-ranged antiferromagnetic correlations, even if we impose a paramagnetic bath.…”
Section: Hubbard Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a situation details of the fitting procedure are important and are accordingly discussed in the literature. [11][12][13][28][29][30] To fit the Anderson parameters V l and l we use the distance function…”
Section: B Fitting the Bath Green Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CDMFT has aleady passed several tests against the exact results and the density matrix renormalization group method in one dimension 19 , where the CDMFT scheme is expected to be worst. We employ exact diagonalization (ED) as an impurity solver of CDMFT 20 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take into account the spatial fluctuations beyond DMFT, besides the systematic 1/D expansion approach, 10,11 various cluster algorithms, e.g., the cellular DMFT (CDMFT), 12,13,14,15 and the dynamical cluster approximation (DCA), 16 have been proposed. The former uses clusters with open boundary conditions, and the latter has periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%