2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2003.00647.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Immune Responses to Cytomegalovirus in Renal Transplant Recipients

Abstract: Control of CMV replication depends primarily on anti-CMV T lymphocyte activity. However, the functional T-cell responses to CMV in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients are not well understood. In this study we employed cytokine flowcytometry (CFC) using pooled CMV peptides and viral lysates to detect CMV-specific T-cell responses in 17 healthy controls, 33 stable renal transplant recipients (Tx recipients) and 6 transplant recipients with active CMV infection (CMV(+)). We found that pooled peptid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
79
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with previous reports showing pp65 and IE1 to be the immunodominant target Ags for peripheral blood CTL in normal CMV-seropositive individuals and seropositive renal transplant recipients (22)(23)(24)(25), although we acknowledge that these CMV-specific T cell responses may underestimate the total cellular response, because recent evidence indicates a broader recognition of other CMV Ags (26 -28 ϩ T cells (CFSE low gated population) were assessed on day 6 following stimulation with CMV lysate (2.5 g/ml) for effector functions using allophycocyanin-labeled anti-IFN-␥, allophycocyanin-labeled anti-TNF-␣, and PE-labeled antigranzyme B, with brefeldin A (10 g/ml) added to cultures for the final 4 h. Also shown are allophycocyanin-labeled and PE-labeled isotype control Ab intracellular staining plots, gating on day 6, CFSE low , CD4…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results are consistent with previous reports showing pp65 and IE1 to be the immunodominant target Ags for peripheral blood CTL in normal CMV-seropositive individuals and seropositive renal transplant recipients (22)(23)(24)(25), although we acknowledge that these CMV-specific T cell responses may underestimate the total cellular response, because recent evidence indicates a broader recognition of other CMV Ags (26 -28 ϩ T cells (CFSE low gated population) were assessed on day 6 following stimulation with CMV lysate (2.5 g/ml) for effector functions using allophycocyanin-labeled anti-IFN-␥, allophycocyanin-labeled anti-TNF-␣, and PE-labeled antigranzyme B, with brefeldin A (10 g/ml) added to cultures for the final 4 h. Also shown are allophycocyanin-labeled and PE-labeled isotype control Ab intracellular staining plots, gating on day 6, CFSE low , CD4…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A similar importance for CD8 ϩ T-cell immunity has been shown in the SOT setting. Analyses of virus-specific T-cell responses in renal transplant recipients demonstrated the presence of dominant CD8 ϩ T-cell responses that may limit viremia and protect against HCMV disease (209,213,238). In lung transplant recipients, the acquisition of HCMV-specific CD8 ϩ T-cell immunity, in addition to CD4 ϩ T-cell immunity, was associated with both freedom from HCMV disease and the preservation of allograft function compared with those who failed to develop HCMV immunity (240).…”
Section: Adaptive Immunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immuknow R , (Cylex, Colombia, MD, USA) which is not specific for CMV). Most studies that have analyzed CMV-specific T-cell responses have used intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-c using flow cytometry (available primarily in research settings) to demonstrate that low levels of CMV-specific cellular immunity predict an increased risk of CMV disease (46-48) and inability to clear viremia (46,49,50 …”
Section: Vaccines and Tailored Prevention Based On Immunology: The Wamentioning
confidence: 99%