2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c23442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Interaction of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Polymer and Hydrogel 3D Microscaffold Templates

Abstract: Biomimicking biological niches of healthy tissues or tumors can be achieved by means of artificial microenvironments, where structural and mechanical properties are crucial parameters to promote tissue formation and recreate natural conditions. In this work, three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds based on woodpile structures were fabricated by two-photon polymerization (2PP) of different photosensitive polymers (IP-S and SZ2080) and hydrogels (PEGDA 700) using two different 2PP setups, a commercial one and a customi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most significant limitation of 2PP is the relatively long printing time hindering the upscaling of the technology ( Moroni et al, 2018 ). Multiple polymeric, hydrogel or composite materials were employed in combination with 2PP to fabricate micro- and nano-patterns as well as 3D structures for in vitro cellular studies involving neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, murine cerebellar granule, chondrocytes, macrophages, neuronal and stem cells ( Marino et al, 2013 ; Accardo et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Turunen et al, 2017 ; Maciulaitis et al, 2019 ; Fendler et al, 2019 ; Babi et al, 2021 ; Bertels et al, 2021 ; Maciulaitis et al, 2021 ; Nouri-Goushki et al, 2021 ; Akolawala et al, 2022 ; Costa et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most significant limitation of 2PP is the relatively long printing time hindering the upscaling of the technology ( Moroni et al, 2018 ). Multiple polymeric, hydrogel or composite materials were employed in combination with 2PP to fabricate micro- and nano-patterns as well as 3D structures for in vitro cellular studies involving neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, murine cerebellar granule, chondrocytes, macrophages, neuronal and stem cells ( Marino et al, 2013 ; Accardo et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Turunen et al, 2017 ; Maciulaitis et al, 2019 ; Fendler et al, 2019 ; Babi et al, 2021 ; Bertels et al, 2021 ; Maciulaitis et al, 2021 ; Nouri-Goushki et al, 2021 ; Akolawala et al, 2022 ; Costa et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons between both 2D and 3D systems under the same experimental conditions have been made using bone-derived materials as scaffolds to adhere patient CML-derived MSC cells supporting leukemic cells; the Ph+ subpopulation was reduced during culture in both systems, but in 3D cultures, this reduction was slower and leukemic cells showed higher CFU rates and frequency of long-term culture-initiating cells after 2 or 5 weeks [34]. Moreover, 3D models are preferred in many cases due to their capability to support complex volumetric structures with minimal toxicity, favoring cell-biomaterial interactions and nutrient exchange [103].…”
Section: Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, several protocols for bioengineering 3D HSC niches have been established for mouse and human HSC and LSC expansion [4,[103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]. A well-designed artificial niche must be adaptable and scalable, facilitate selective incorporation of a variety of biochemical signals and allow the use of high-throughput or single-cell techniques, in addition to overcoming biomechanical and biotransport restrictions [68].…”
Section: Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations