2020
DOI: 10.1177/2472555219896278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Target Engagement Approaches to Monitor Epigenetic Reader Domain Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many ways to introduce NL-target DNA into the chosen cell line, including viral transduction, stable transfection and CRISPR-Cas9 knock-in. The protocol below will detail how to introduce NL-BRD4 expression plasmids into HEK293 cells via transient transfection, however an alternative CRISPR-Cas9 knock-in approach to insert a HiBit tag (part of a split NL) onto the N- terminus of BRD4 in HEK293 cells has also been successful for this target ( Phillipou et al., 2019 ). It is advisable to test that the addition of the NL tag has not affected the expected localization of your protein, which can be done by immune-cytochemical or luminescence imaging.…”
Section: Before You Beginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many ways to introduce NL-target DNA into the chosen cell line, including viral transduction, stable transfection and CRISPR-Cas9 knock-in. The protocol below will detail how to introduce NL-BRD4 expression plasmids into HEK293 cells via transient transfection, however an alternative CRISPR-Cas9 knock-in approach to insert a HiBit tag (part of a split NL) onto the N- terminus of BRD4 in HEK293 cells has also been successful for this target ( Phillipou et al., 2019 ). It is advisable to test that the addition of the NL tag has not affected the expected localization of your protein, which can be done by immune-cytochemical or luminescence imaging.…”
Section: Before You Beginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NanoBRET is adaptable to a high-throughput format and has been used to aid in the development of inhibitors of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), 31 bromodomains, 32 the adenosine A3 receptor, 33 and salt-inducible kinases. 34 Some other examples include a study by Pavlinov et al, who used an NLuc/HaloTag strategy to assess Beclin 1–ATG14L interactions.…”
Section: Nanobretmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the high quantum yield of NanoLuc and the possibility to combine BRET assay with NanoLuc-derived split luciferase reporter system (NanoBiT, described above) ensures the development of BRET assay with increased sensitivity. It allows the monitoring of protein–protein interactions at lower and more physiologically-relevant levels [ 182 ] and analysis of interactions with low selectivity or affinity which have previously been challenging [ 183 , 184 ]. The NanoLuc bioluminescence spectrum (λ max = ~460 nm) is about 20% narrower compared with that of RLuc, enabling improved spectral separation of donor and acceptor emissions and the use of various fluorophores as acceptors.…”
Section: Ctz-dependent Luciferase Analytical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive reviews on NanoBRET methodology and applications have been published recently [ 197 , 198 ]. NanoBRET is successfully used for studying protein–protein interactions [ 184 , 199 ], or investigations on receptor activation [ 190 , 199 , 200 ], oligomerization [ 201 ], conformational states [ 186 ], proximities [ 189 , 202 ], and receptor–ligand interactions [ 200 , 201 , 203 ]. NanoBRET technology has been also applied for in vivo imaging.…”
Section: Ctz-dependent Luciferase Analytical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%