2009
DOI: 10.3389/neuro.02.028.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular transport and membrane dynamics of the glycine receptor

Abstract: Regulation of synaptic transmission is essential to tune individual-to-network neuronal activity. One way to modulate synaptic strength is to regulate neurotransmitter receptor numbers at postsynaptic sites. This can be achieved either through plasma membrane insertion of receptors derived from intracellular vesicle pools, a process depending on active cytoskeleton transport, or through surface membrane removal via endocytosis. In parallel, lateral diffusion events along the plasma membrane allow the exchange … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the binding of glycine molecules to the receptor displays a strong cooperativity (Legendre, 2001;Burzomato et al, 2004), whereby IPSC kinetics are likely related to the magnitude of the glycine transient in the cleft and to allosteric modulation of the receptor (Fucile et al, 2000;Suwa et al, 2001). In addition, the kinetics of glycinergic currents depend on the receptor membrane density (Taleb and Betz, 1994;De Saint Jan et al, 2001;Legendre et al, 2002), so that glycinergic kinetics could be rapidly modified via the activity-dependent modulation of the density of postsynaptic GlyR (Lévi et al, 2008;Dumoulin et al, 2009). Immunohistochemical data and paired recordings suggest that such a regulation of GlyR density, rather than the variability in presynaptic transmitter content, might occur in UBCs and cause kinetics variability.…”
Section: Different Dynamic Properties Of the Gaba And Glycine Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the binding of glycine molecules to the receptor displays a strong cooperativity (Legendre, 2001;Burzomato et al, 2004), whereby IPSC kinetics are likely related to the magnitude of the glycine transient in the cleft and to allosteric modulation of the receptor (Fucile et al, 2000;Suwa et al, 2001). In addition, the kinetics of glycinergic currents depend on the receptor membrane density (Taleb and Betz, 1994;De Saint Jan et al, 2001;Legendre et al, 2002), so that glycinergic kinetics could be rapidly modified via the activity-dependent modulation of the density of postsynaptic GlyR (Lévi et al, 2008;Dumoulin et al, 2009). Immunohistochemical data and paired recordings suggest that such a regulation of GlyR density, rather than the variability in presynaptic transmitter content, might occur in UBCs and cause kinetics variability.…”
Section: Different Dynamic Properties Of the Gaba And Glycine Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tail region of KIFs interacts with adaptor proteins, which recognize cargos containing specific molecules to be transported (Hirokawa et al, 2010;Hirokawa et al, 2009;Kardon and Vale, 2009;Millecamps and Julien, 2013). An appropriate combination of a motor protein and an adaptor protein appears to be important for accurate targeting of synaptic components (Dumoulin et al, 2009;Jeyifous et al, 2009;Setou et al, 2002;Terauchi and Umemori, 2012;Washbourne et al, 2004;Zheng et al, 2011). Here, we examine how the two presynaptic organizers FGF22 and FGF7 are transported to the appropriate locations so that they act as synapsetype-specific organizing molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaffolding proteins ensure accurate localization of neurotransmitter receptors at synaptic sites, thereby controlling both long-term stability as well as plasticity of synapses (1). At inhibitory synapses the scaffolding protein gephyrin provides docking sites for glycine receptors (GlyRs) 2 and GABA A receptors (GABA A R) (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%