2007
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-972925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Celocentesis for In Utero Stem Cell Therapy: Where We Now Stand and Future Directions

Abstract: As the number of inborn errors of metabolism that can be diagnosed prenatally by direct DNA analysis increases, so will the number of patients interested in having prenatal diagnosis for these conditions. The phenotypic expression of these inherited inborn errors of metabolism in theory could be prevented by the in utero transplantation of donor stem cells. It is the authors' opinion that ultrasound-guided celocentesis performed in the timed-pregnant baboon animal model could have an important role for determi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in the near future, we intend to extrapolate these findings to our experimental models, attempting to pave the way for prenatal cell-based therapy for catastrophic genetic conditions. 31 In conclusion, we confirm that the fetal thymus can be measured and present normative data suggesting that fetal sex does not affect the size of the thymus. Further research is now required to determine whether the fetal thymus can be used as an indirect marker for functional thymic insufficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Moreover, in the near future, we intend to extrapolate these findings to our experimental models, attempting to pave the way for prenatal cell-based therapy for catastrophic genetic conditions. 31 In conclusion, we confirm that the fetal thymus can be measured and present normative data suggesting that fetal sex does not affect the size of the thymus. Further research is now required to determine whether the fetal thymus can be used as an indirect marker for functional thymic insufficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%