2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4635-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cement Microstructures and Durability in Ancient Roman Seawater Concretes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the significant investment and durability of the cement used in the construction process (Jackson et al, 2012), the overall state of the harbor had significantly deteriorated by the end of the 2nd century CE, and probably even earlier, according to radiocarbon-dated sedimentological evidence showing a shift from a low-energy, harbor environment to an open-water exposed, unprotected environment during that period (Reinhardt and Raban, 1999;Reinhardt et al, 1994). Throughout the 1990s, the generally accepted presumption arising from these studies was that the harbor experienced its demise due to some combination of earthquake-related liquefaction, with some credence also given to the possibility of related tsunami, though without clear markers then to support such a hypothesis.…”
Section: Evidence For Tsunami Impacts On Coastal Morphology and Assocmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, despite the significant investment and durability of the cement used in the construction process (Jackson et al, 2012), the overall state of the harbor had significantly deteriorated by the end of the 2nd century CE, and probably even earlier, according to radiocarbon-dated sedimentological evidence showing a shift from a low-energy, harbor environment to an open-water exposed, unprotected environment during that period (Reinhardt and Raban, 1999;Reinhardt et al, 1994). Throughout the 1990s, the generally accepted presumption arising from these studies was that the harbor experienced its demise due to some combination of earthquake-related liquefaction, with some credence also given to the possibility of related tsunami, though without clear markers then to support such a hypothesis.…”
Section: Evidence For Tsunami Impacts On Coastal Morphology and Assocmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…the gel-palagonite pozzolan could eventually produce secondary zeolitic cementitious hydrates. Ancient Roman pozzolanic harbor concretes, for example, developed zeolites in the pores of a pumiceous mortar while submerged in seawater [64]. Basaltic cinder cone fields occur throughout the world and their gel-palagonite component, detected through the petrographic analyses described in this study, could play an important role in enhancing the very long-term chemical and mechanical durability of environmentally-sustainable concretes, while substantially reducing CO 2 emissions associated with kiln-fired OPC.…”
Section: Microscopic Investigations Of Cementitious Hydration Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). C-A-S-H associated with the diverse reactive components of scoriacous volcanic ash in the monuments of ancient Rome and glassy pumiceous ash in ancient Roman seawater concretes, for example, also has a range of compositions [63,64]. Laboratory experiments [62], have shown that the presence of Al enhances alkali binding in C-A-S-H, and inhomogeneous alkali sorption likely occurs in small clusters of C-A-S-H with low Ca/Si compositions similar to those observed here.…”
Section: Microscopic Investigations Of Cementitious Hydration Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) and packed this with decimeter-sized chunks of zeolitic tuff into underwater forms (Oleson et al 2004). The ash, lime, and seawater reacted to produce poorly crystalline calcium-aluminum-silicate-hydrate (C-A-S-H) binder, intermingled with altered pumice and glass relicts in a complex cementitious matrix, which includes 11 Å Al-tobermorite (where Al 3+ substitutes for Si 4+ ) in relict pebble lime clasts (Barnes and Scheetz 1991;Vola et al 2011a;Stanislao et al 2011;Jackson et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%